Teams

LJTH-Theisen/NMP

2024-2025 Racquets & Jackets Tri-Level Doubles · Men Division B (3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-02-09vs LSMA-Manly/Jetton RJWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Peeler / Kenneth Sigmon vs Joseph Spain / Sandy Manly6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Earnshaw / Jon Theisen vs Douglas Gay / Nathaniel Carter6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Peeler / Michael Dixon vs Adam Feinberg / Joshua Aronowitz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Peeler / Neil McLean vs Russell Swift / Adam Lidgey4-6, 2-6
2025-02-01vs RJLCAshley/WestportLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Peeler / Steve Riddle vs Ralf Strauss / Josh Henley7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2025-01-12vs RJLCAshley/WestportLost 02
L#2 DoublesKenneth Sigmon / David Peeler vs George Simonetti / Stephen Phillips1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Riddle / Kevin Loomis vs Josh Henley / Ralf Strauss6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-12-21vs LSMA-Manly/Jetton RJWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Peeler / Steve Riddle vs Randy Carlson / Sandy Manly4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-12-14vs LAFE-Feinberg/Jetton Net NavigatorsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSteve Riddle / David Peeler vs Shabari Kandasami / Sam Yin0-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesNeil McLean / Kevin Loomis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-12-07vs RJLCAshley/WestportSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDavid Peeler / Kenneth Sigmon vs Bruce Brooks / Richard Regruto2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesNeil McLean / Jon Theisen vs Scott Robinson / Andy Powers5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-11-23vs LSMA-Manly/Jetton RJSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJon Theisen / Andrew Howland vs Gary Jones / Pete Ramanata3-4
L#3 DoublesNeil McLean / Kevin Loomis vs Ryan Neufeld / Randy Carlson6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men Division B (3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Stephen Varshine
published
3.29
Kevin Loomis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Andrew Howland
published 3.5
3.08
Chris Kilbane
published
3.08
Scott Earnshaw
published
2.92
David Romley
published 3
2.86
Jon Theisen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Neil McLean
published
2.69
David Peeler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Keith MacVean
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Peeler + Jon Theisen123 matchesnot enough data
David Peeler + Kevin Loomis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Varshine
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Kevin Loomis
74W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Andrew Howland
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Chris Kilbane
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Scott Earnshaw
0W–10L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.08
3
David Romley
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.92
3
Jon Theisen
41W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Neil McLean
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
David Peeler
44W–60L career · 8 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Keith MacVean
34W–88L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.