Teams

LAFE-Feinberg/Jetton Net Navigators

2024-2025 Racquets & Jackets Tri-Level Doubles · Men Division B (3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-02-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesJacob Lenz / Sam Yin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesSam Yin / Sean Yin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSean Yin / Sam Yin vs James Thompson / Pete Ramanata0-6, 1-6
2025-01-26vs LSMA-Manly/Jetton RJWon 10
W#2 DoublesDouglas Gay / Sean Yin vs Ranjith Rajadurai / Marc Dy6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2025-01-25vs RJLCAshley/WestportWon 10
W#3 DoublesTodd Wilkins / William Cune vs Andy Powers / COTTON DAVIS6-2, 6-0
2024-12-21vs RJLCAshley/WestportLost 01
L#1 DoublesSam Yin / Sriharan Sriniwass vs Thomas Andrews / Stefano Vignati0-6, 3-6
2024-12-14vs LJTH-Theisen/NMPWon 10
W#2 DoublesShabari Kandasami / Sam Yin vs Steve Riddle / David Peeler6-0, 7-5
2024-11-23vs RJLCAshley/WestportLost 01
L#2 DoublesDouglas Gay / Sam Yin vs George Simonetti / Stephen Phillips1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men Division B (3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Jacob Lenz
published
3.43
Todd Wilkins
published
3.16
Nathaniel Carter
published
3.12
William Cune
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Adam Lidgey
published 3
3.01
Russell Swift
published
2.96
Sam Yin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Shabari Kandasami
published
2.79
Sean Yin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Adam Feinberg
published 3
Walter Rodriguez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sam Yin + Sean Yin9852% games+8.5% vs expected
Russell Swift + Adam Feinberg1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacob Lenz
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Todd Wilkins
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Nathaniel Carter
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
3
William Cune
61W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Adam Lidgey
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Russell Swift
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Sam Yin
49W–48L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Shabari Kandasami
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Sean Yin
24W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Adam Feinberg
4W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Walter Rodriguez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.