Teams

Apollo Pretty In Pink - S. Patrick

2024 Hillsborough TriLevel 18 & Over · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-16vs Hills/Gregory/TriLevel3.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Flynn / Arielle Flynn vs Lisa Polk / Kaitlyn Caterinicchia4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-08-09vs Hills/Dreisbach/TriLevel3.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Flynn / Arielle Flynn vs Katie Johnson / Amanda Rockwood2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-08-02vs Buckhorn Bananas - D. CunninghamWon 10
W#1 DoublesEvonski Lennear / Susan Mason vs Danielle Cunningham / Deb Spears6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesEvonski Lennear / Mary Flynn vs Angie Mudge / Sherri Bornstine6-1, 6-4
2024-07-12vs Buckhorn Babes - D. LinthicumWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Mason / Tammy Selindh vs Nicole Evans / Kelly Mamott7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2024-06-21vs Hills/Gregory/TriLevel3.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Flynn / Susan Mason vs Kaitlyn Caterinicchia / Lisa Polk3-6, 0-6
2024-06-14vs Hills/Dreisbach/TriLevel3.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesEvonski Lennear / Barbara Dolan vs Amanda Rockwood / Katie Johnson0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Arielle Flynn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.15
Mary Flynn
published
3.14
Evonski Lennear
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Susan Mason
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Nicovi Singh
published
2.76
Kathleen Gafarian
published
2.52
Oumaima Kaab
published
2.33
Barbara Dolan
published 3
2.24
Sonia Isacchi
published
2.23
Michelle Graba
published
2.17
Elizabeth Hanlon
published 2.5
2.14
Melissa Speidel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Hanlon + Melissa Speidel3252% games+2.4% vs expected
Margaret McGillivray + Kathleen Gafarian6063% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Graba + Melissa Speidel134 matchesnot enough data
Evonski Lennear + Mary Flynn224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Mason + Evonski Lennear213 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Speidel + Oumaima Kaab123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Arielle Flynn
93W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.76
Mary Flynn
8W–32L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Evonski Lennear
53W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
Susan Mason
43W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.98
Nicovi Singh
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.93
Kathleen Gafarian
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
Oumaima Kaab
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%42%58%
2.52
3
Barbara Dolan
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
2.33
Sonia Isacchi
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.24
Michelle Graba
10W–17L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Elizabeth Hanlon
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.17
Melissa Speidel
8W–17L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Margaret McGillivray
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.