Teams

Hills/Gregory/TriLevel3.5W

2024 Hillsborough TriLevel 18 & Over · 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.46 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesLisa Polk / Kaitlyn Caterinicchia vs Mary Flynn / Arielle Flynn6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKrista Mills / Kristin Nail vs Nicovi Singh / Margaret McGillivray6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesBrittney Herron / Kaitlyn Caterinicchia vs Patricia Smith / Dang Williamson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKaren Wingard / Lacy Gregory vs Christy Clinard / Jackie Wyckoff6-2, 6-3
2024-08-02vs Buckhorn Babes - D. LinthicumSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrittany Cooper / Stephanie van Brocklin vs Nicole Evans / Erin Lobner7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKrista Mills / Kristin Nail vs Natalya Burlakova / Carlee Revoy6-4, 7-5
W#1 DoublesKaitlyn Caterinicchia / Brittany Cooper vs Ronghui You / Xue Chan7-6, 6-2
2024-07-17vs Buckhorn Bananas - D. CunninghamWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrittney Herron / Stephanie van Brocklin vs Danielle Cunningham / Pam Smith6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKrista Mills / MARY HESTON vs Tammy Hohman / Susan MOSHER6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Pedraza / Jennifer Noll vs Ann Dunleavy / Melissa Wolczak3-6, 3-6
2024-07-12vs Hills/Dreisbach/TriLevel3.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrittney Herron / Kaitlyn Caterinicchia vs Courtney Johnson / Lisa Dreisbach6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKrista Mills / MARY HESTON vs Emily Baldwin / Coley Simmons3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Noll / Christina Pedraza vs Maggie Packer / Katy Lannon0-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesKaitlyn Caterinicchia / Lisa Polk vs Mary Flynn / Susan Mason6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKrista Mills / Karen Wingard vs Kathleen Gafarian / Nicovi Singh6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesBrittany Cooper / Brittney Herron vs Dang Williamson / Catherine Mueller6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAshley Gagne / Krista Mills vs Betty McIntosh / Patricia Smith6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristina Pedraza / Erika Sumner vs Lauren Lelewski / Melissa Foster7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Kaitlyn Caterinicchia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Brittney Herron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.55
MARY HESTON
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.51
Brittany Cooper
published 3.5
3.40
Stephanie van Brocklin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Lisa Polk
published
3.27
Karen Wingard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Ashley Gagne
published 3.5
3.25
Lacy Gregory
published
3.21
Krista Mills
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Kristin Nail
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Monica Mirza
published 3.5
3.08
Christina Pedraza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Erika Sumner
published 3
2.65
Jennifer Noll
published
2.33
Laura Pennington
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Wingard + Kristin Nail24363% games+11.9% vs expected
MARY HESTON + Kaitlyn Caterinicchia12261% games+9.1% vs expected
MARY HESTON + Krista Mills7655% games+6.0% vs expected
Stephanie van Brocklin + Kaitlyn Caterinicchia11363% games+2.7% vs expected
Stephanie van Brocklin + MARY HESTON301559% games+1.0% vs expected
Brittney Herron + Kaitlyn Caterinicchia8554% games+0.1% vs expected
Brittney Herron + MARY HESTON6069% gamesnot enough data
Krista Mills + Kristin Nail4164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kaitlyn Caterinicchia
115W–46L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.89
3.5
Brittney Herron
95W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
MARY HESTON
124W–51L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.55
3.5
Brittany Cooper
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Stephanie van Brocklin
155W–79L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
Lisa Polk
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Karen Wingard
117W–68L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Ashley Gagne
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Lacy Gregory
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.25
3.5
Krista Mills
68W–33L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Kristin Nail
80W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.19
3.5
Monica Mirza
20W–19L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.17
3
Christina Pedraza
77W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Erika Sumner
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
Jennifer Noll
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65
Laura Pennington
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%0%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.