Teams

Hampton Smash Sisters Doubles - W. Li

2024 Hillsborough TriLevel 18 & Over · 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesRonghui You / Wenhong Li vs Sherri Bornstine / Catherine Mueller6-3, 6-3
2024-07-19vs Hills/Dreisbach/TriLevel3.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesFan Wang / Wenhong Li vs Lisa Dreisbach / Coley Simmons6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesClaudia George / Beatriz Cardona vs Lindsay Davitt / Courtney Steiner6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-12vs Buckhorn Bananas - D. CunninghamWon 10
W#1 DoublesWenhong Li / Fan Wang vs Danielle Cunningham / Monica Eiermann6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBeatriz Cardona / Danna Sturman vs Kathleen Gafarian / Margaret McGillivray6-3, 6-4
2024-06-14vs Buckhorn Babes - D. LinthicumWon 10
W#1 DoublesWenhong Li / Xue Chan vs Dena Linthicum / Janese Dennis2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Ronghui You
published 4
3.55
Lily Ly
published
3.48
Fan Wang
published 3.5
3.40
Wenhong Li
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Danna Sturman
published 3.5
3.16
Beatriz Cardona
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Xue Chan
published
3.00
Wei Xue
published
2.77
Hong Liu
published 3
2.67
Claudia George
published 3
2.66
Alyson Thomas
published 3
2.65
Ludwiga McClendon
published
2.61
Karan Orbegoso
published
2.21
Siwon Jang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wenhong Li + Ronghui You181059% games+5.2% vs expected
Wenhong Li + Xue Chan5061% games+3.3% vs expected
Alyson Thomas + Karan Orbegoso4161% gamesnot enough data
Siwon Jang + Alyson Thomas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ronghui You
81W–49L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Lily Ly
8W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Fan Wang
32W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Wenhong Li
116W–62L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Danna Sturman
15W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Beatriz Cardona
105W–75L career · 6 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.16
Xue Chan
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.07
Wei Xue
22W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.00
3
Hong Liu
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Claudia George
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Alyson Thomas
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
2.66
Ludwiga McClendon
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
Karan Orbegoso
19W–22L career · no lines in 2024
0%20%80%
2.61
Siwon Jang
16W–25L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.