Teams

CDTA S 18&O 3.0M Centennial Sioufi 2 Sun 1 $20

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WN · WE

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesCharles Nevel / Zeshan Sakaria vs Randall Lehner / Eric Sanders2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDhaval Mishra vs Christopher Dressel7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJeffrey Aleman vs Joshua Carncross6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJames Cullen vs Alex Bender1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlan Brodsky / Lawrence Levin vs TERENCE MCMAHON / Mandy Yabut3-6, 5-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesZeshan Sakaria vs Matthew Pearson0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Aleman / Dhaval Mishra vs Meeraj Thaker / Brendan Murphy5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesTony Patricelli / Todd Riggs vs Jeremy Bradford / Alexander Drapatsky6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLarry Abrams / Dhaval Mishra vs Ming Gao / Lucas Liu3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJeffrey Aleman vs Chris Sioufi6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Paton / Zeshan Sakaria vs Gregory Franzo / Earl Stoner4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesLarry Abrams / David Paton vs Jeremy Bradford / Gregory Franzo1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Aleman vs Lucas Liu3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLawrence Levin / Dhaval Mishra vs Chris Sioufi / Earl Stoner3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAlan Brodsky / Sorin Sandu vs Alexander Drapatsky / Jamie Gozy2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesJames Cullen / Tony Patricelli vs John Compton / Michael DeLio1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSorin Sandu / Zeshan Sakaria vs Daniel Grieco / Jake Wasserman0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesLawrence Levin / Todd Riggs vs Christopher Caya / Matthew Pearson3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Aleman vs Alex Bender0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlan Brodsky / Dhaval Mishra vs Shawn Budde / Bob Jenkins3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesZeshan Sakaria / Sorin Sandu vs TERENCE MCMAHON / Mandy Yabut0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesTony Patricelli / Todd Riggs vs Segundo Auqui / Alexander Drapatsky3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLawrence Levin / Charles Nevel vs Jeremy Bradford / Lucas Liu0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesDhaval Mishra vs Ming Gao4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAlan Brodsky / David Paton vs Jamie Gozy / Earl Stoner0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesLawrence Levin / Kevin Lookis vs Daniel Grieco / John Compton3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Aleman vs Dean Gastouniotis6-7, 1-3
L#2 SinglesDhaval Mishra vs Ming Tang2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesLarry Abrams / Charles Nevel vs Matthew Pearson / Barney Straus1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDhaval Mishra / Tony Patricelli vs Shawn Budde / Bob Jenkins7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJeffrey Aleman vs Amit Mallik3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAlan Brodsky / Zeshan Sakaria vs Mandy Yabut / Meeraj Thaker1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&O 3.0M Centennial Sioufi 1 Sat 11 $209037822298
2CDTA S 18&O 3.0M Centennial McMahon Sat 1 $2054261947356
3CDTA S 18&O 3.0M MT Chi Brown Sat 3 $2545222349366
4CDTA S 18&O 3.0M Centennial Sioufi 2 Sun 1 $200954082516

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Jeffrey Aleman
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3
2.85
Todd Riggs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Alan Brodsky
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
David Paton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Charles Nevel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Chris Sioufi
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Dhaval Mishra
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
James Cullen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kevin Lookis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lawrence Levin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Zeshan Sakaria
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alan Brodsky + Lawrence Levin0826% gamesnot enough data
Charles Nevel + Todd Riggs134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jeffrey Aleman
39W–39L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
2.97
Todd Riggs
30W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Alan Brodsky
1W–58L career · 5 lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
2.36
2.5
David Paton
0W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Charles Nevel
6W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Chris Sioufi
58W–51L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Dhaval Mishra
3W–16L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
James Cullen
3W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kevin Lookis
10W–37L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Lawrence Levin
17W–78L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Zeshan Sakaria
0W–12L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.