Teams

CDTA E 55&O W7.0 Heritage Wozniewski Sat 2 $21

CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA ESL 55&O W 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-27Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Jo Scarpelli / Kathy Mahowald vs Julie Alexander / Laura Munitz Johnson3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesBeth Carr / Alicia Tisbo vs Marie Hajduk / Chalise Short3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Gitter / Mary Jo Scarpelli vs Cathy Kakuska / Mary Jo Kamarauskas6-7, 0-5
W#3 DoublesLynn Greisman / Joan Cooney vs Mary Parsons / Joan Vander Linde7-6, 6-3
W#1 DoublesMiriam Wozniewski / Barbara Chmieleski vs Cate Brodner / Sarah W Johnson3-6, 6-5
W#2 DoublesCynthia Gitter / Mary Jo Scarpelli vs Michele Young / Kay Noonan6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMary Kay Kolseth / Joan Cooney vs Jennifer Cicciu / Donna Salvatore6-4, 3-4
L#1 DoublesCynthia Gitter / Mary Jo Scarpelli vs Katherine Wood / Leah Cannon1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Kay Kolseth / Beth Carr vs Ivie Cohn / Marell Kowalski1-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesBarbara Chmieleski / Alicia Tisbo vs Margo Carvell / Maureen Kiess6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMary Jo Scarpelli / Mary Kay Kolseth vs Ryoko Howell / Lynn Callahan6-7, 4-3
L#3 DoublesIrene Okada / Margaret Lovelette vs Audene Gordon / Mitzi Kastner0-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesBarbara Chmieleski / Alicia Tisbo vs Diane Egan / Robin Ford3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMary Jo Scarpelli / Cynthia Gitter vs Jody Sternberg / Debra Feldman6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLynn Greisman / Margaret Lovelette vs Suzanne Reed / GRACE CARDOS7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesLynn Greisman / Alicia Tisbo vs Leah Cannon / Kim Conradi3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMiriam Wozniewski / Barbara Chmieleski vs Marell Kowalski / Patti Landreth1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCynthia Gitter / Mary Jo Scarpelli vs Ivie Cohn / Laura Lapp6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesMiriam Wozniewski / Barbara Chmieleski vs Mitzi Kastner / Audene Gordon3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLynn Greisman / Mary Kay Kolseth vs Leanne Whitlock / SUSAN SHEEHAN3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMary Jo Scarpelli / Cynthia Gitter vs Cecilia Lauterbach / Ryoko Howell5-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · CDTA ESL 55&O W 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&O W7.0 Lake Bluff Eichner Sun 4 $209124617202
2CDTA E 55&O W7.0 Naperville Bianchi Sun 6:30 $228222819200
3CDTA E 55&O W7.0 Schaumburg Sweeney Sun 1 $2073161432271
4CDTA E 55&O W7.0 Tam Landreth Sat 3 $2246151531220
5CDTA E 55&O W7.0 Heritage Wozniewski Sat 2 $211972346324
6CDTA E 55&O W7.0 Glenbrook Edidin Sat 5 $251962449308

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Irene Okada
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Alicia Tisbo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cynthia Gitter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Meg LaMonica
published
3.21
Lynn Greisman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Barbara Chmieleski
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.80
Joan Cooney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Margaret Lovelette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Beth Carr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kathleen Leahy
published
Mary Jo Scarpelli
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Kay Kolseth
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Miriam Wozniewski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Cooney + Mary Jo Scarpelli12563% games+1.0% vs expected
Cynthia Gitter + Barbara Chmieleski1941% games−8.3% vs expected
Cynthia Gitter + Mary Jo Scarpelli71146% games−11.8% vs expected
Joan Cooney + Miriam Wozniewski51036% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Chmieleski + Miriam Wozniewski3638% gamesnot enough data
Miriam Wozniewski + Mary Jo Scarpelli1838% gamesnot enough data
Joan Cooney + Beth Carr3554% gamesnot enough data
Beth Carr + Lynn Greisman4455% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Irene Okada
130W–68L career · 1 line in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Alicia Tisbo
27W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Cynthia Gitter
11W–27L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Meg LaMonica
93W–98L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Lynn Greisman
24W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Barbara Chmieleski
60W–158L career · 5 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Joan Cooney
96W–133L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
Margaret Lovelette
13W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
2.75
Beth Carr
29W–50L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Leahy
33W–27L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Jo Scarpelli
58W–68L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Kay Kolseth
13W–10L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Miriam Wozniewski
39W–80L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.