Teams

CDTA E 55&O W7.0 Naperville Bianchi Sun 6:30 $22

CDTA ESL 55 & Over · CDTA ESL 55&O W 7.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.45 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesCheryl Engle / Jane Strien vs Katherine Wood / Mary Patrick6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNorma Ericson / Mary Jo Kamarauskas vs Carol Paddock / Midge Mountin6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesStephanie Batka / Judy Stevens vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesMarie Hajduk / Chalise Short vs Beth Carr / Alicia Tisbo6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCathy Kakuska / Mary Jo Kamarauskas vs Cynthia Gitter / Mary Jo Scarpelli7-6, 5-0
L#3 DoublesMary Parsons / Joan Vander Linde vs Lynn Greisman / Joan Cooney6-7, 3-6
W#1 DoublesMarie Hajduk / Jane Strien vs Sheila Weinberg / Sarah W Johnson6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCheryl Engle / Mary Jo Kamarauskas vs Jennifer Cicciu / Rosie Weaver6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChalise Short / Donna Smoldt vs Donna Salvatore / Helen Kim6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesChalise Short / Marie Hajduk vs Vina Maniquis / Christina Greeley3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Smoldt / Cathy Kakuska vs Linda Meyer / Lynette Paulsen5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Parsons / Lesa Moskowitz vs Diane Egan / Rita Eichner2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesMarie Hajduk / Jane Strien vs Mary Patrick / Mary Hanrahan6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLesa Moskowitz / Mary Parsons vs Leah Cannon / Ivie Cohn6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesStephanie Batka / Judy Stevens vs Laura McGrady / Kim Conradi2-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesCathy Kakuska / Jane Strien vs Mitzi Kastner / Maureen Kiess7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNorma Ericson / Donna Smoldt vs Karen Hayslett / SUSAN SHEEHAN5-7, 5-6
W#3 DoublesJoan Vander Linde / Chalise Short vs Lynn Callahan / Margo Carvell7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2022-11-20Won 30
W#1 DoublesCathy Kakuska / Donna Smoldt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLesa Moskowitz / Joan Vander Linde vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNorma Ericson / Kelly Lyn Kelly vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesMarie Hajduk / Norma Ericson vs Mindey Johnson / Vilia Dedinas2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesStephanie Batka / Kelly Lyn Kelly vs Vina Maniquis / Robin Ford6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJoan Vander Linde / Lesa Moskowitz vs Astrid Ellis / Rochelle Meng6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesStephanie Batka / Catherine Golz vs Margo Carvell / Peggy Schwerman6-4, 5-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarie Hajduk / Jane Strien vs SUSAN SHEEHAN / Cecilia Lauterbach6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSharon Martinez / Mary Parsons vs Rita Williams / Maureen Kiess6-1, 6-4
W#1 DoublesStephanie Batka / Catherine Golz vs Michele Young / Karen Hirsch6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarie Hajduk / Jane Strien vs Sheila Weinberg / Helen Kim6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSharon Martinez / Chalise Short vs Robin Meister / Jo Ellen Reed6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · CDTA ESL 55&O W 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 55&O W7.0 Lake Bluff Eichner Sun 4 $209124617202
2CDTA E 55&O W7.0 Naperville Bianchi Sun 6:30 $228222819200
3CDTA E 55&O W7.0 Schaumburg Sweeney Sun 1 $2073161432271
4CDTA E 55&O W7.0 Tam Landreth Sat 3 $2246151531220
5CDTA E 55&O W7.0 Heritage Wozniewski Sat 2 $211972346324
6CDTA E 55&O W7.0 Glenbrook Edidin Sat 5 $251962449308

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Stephanie Batka
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.37
Jane Strien
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Mary Jo Kamarauskas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Lesa Moskowitz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Marie Hajduk
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.22
Norma Ericson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Donna Smoldt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Cheryl Engle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Cathy Kakuska
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Katherine Bianchi
published
2.73
Sharon Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Catherine Golz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Chalise Short
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Joan Vander Linde
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Judy Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Lyn Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Parsons
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Strien + Marie Hajduk11070% games+11.8% vs expected
Stephanie Batka + Jane Strien19073% games+11.2% vs expected
Chalise Short + Marie Hajduk4453% games+5.1% vs expected
Lesa Moskowitz + Cheryl Engle12752% games−4.7% vs expected
Catherine Golz + Sharon Martinez2836% gamesnot enough data
Norma Ericson + Sharon Martinez3352% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Bianchi + Marie Hajduk4253% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Golz + Stephanie Batka4259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephanie Batka
329W–235L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
3.5
Jane Strien
154W–56L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Mary Jo Kamarauskas
40W–50L career · type S · 4 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Lesa Moskowitz
134W–118L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Marie Hajduk
130W–86L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Norma Ericson
87W–48L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Donna Smoldt
27W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Cheryl Engle
97W–122L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Cathy Kakuska
109W–117L career · 4 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Katherine Bianchi
84W–66L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Sharon Martinez
115W–167L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Catherine Golz
67W–80L career · 2 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
2.58
Chalise Short
49W–37L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joan Vander Linde
48W–66L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Judy Stevens
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Kelly Lyn Kelly
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mary Parsons
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.