Teams

LTFCS VANDEVEER

2023 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - SOCO · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-02vs PBTC HENSONWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndy Field / Jessica Field vs Frank Frantz / Rebecca VanBuskirk6-3, 6-3
2023-06-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Barker / Zach Barker vs Randy Anderson / Judy Mitchell4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-04vs LTFCS KALEOWon 20
W#1 DoublesZach Barker / Nancy Barker vs Vincent Lopez / Kelly Cavanaugh5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndy Field / Jessica Field vs Frederick Thurman / Lisa Bischoff6-4, 6-4
2023-05-28vs CCW WOLFELost 02
L#1 DoublesZach Barker / Nancy Barker vs Lee Wolfe / Jennifer Charlier Cox2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAndy Field / Jessica Field vs Craig Gaydos / Kim Young4-6, 4-6
2023-05-21vs PBTC HENSONWon 10
W#1 DoublesZach Barker / Nancy Barker vs Michael Herzog / Emily Vidmar6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Nancy Barker
published
3.49
Andy Field
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.39
Lisa VanDeVeer
published
3.33
Zach Barker
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.29
John Purcell
published
3.19
Scott VanDeVeer
published
2.96
Jessica Field
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Leon Goorabian
published
Shinobu Voss
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott VanDeVeer + Lisa VanDeVeer7456% games+13.2% vs expected
Jessica Field + Andy Field17760% games+9.3% vs expected
Nancy Barker + Zach Barker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Barker
54W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
3.5
Andy Field
105W–50L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
Lisa VanDeVeer
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Zach Barker
114W–81L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.33
John Purcell
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Scott VanDeVeer
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Jessica Field
106W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
2.96
Leon Goorabian
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shinobu Voss
5W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.