Teams

LEBTC GREEN

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs PH GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMeghan Page / Dorothy Carr vs Brooke Fox / Kathy Aarnio5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKelly Callister vs Abigail Smith6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Cabot / Kathy Hoskins vs Teri Markle / Wendy Hynes3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRobin DiCicco / Casey Clarke vs Amy Attwood / Molly Blake2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-07vs KC-CC NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesMeghan Page / Dorothy Carr vs Annamaria Augustine / Lisa Killion6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesFarrah Johnson vs Ellen Lee6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Cabot / Kathy Hoskins vs Aura Leigh Ferguson / Jean Pullen6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCasey Clarke / Becki Jernigan vs Carla Minckley / Magdalena Smith6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-07-01vs LEBTC NAVYWon 40
W#1 DoublesDorothy Carr / Becki Jernigan vs Kim Gayeski / Jana Donohoe2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesFarrah Johnson vs Julie Garrick6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLisa Cabot / Kathy Hoskins vs Stephanie Auth / Amy Allmon6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobin DiCicco / Jennifer Lord vs Sarah Veitenhaus / Winddee Stallings7-6, 6-1
2025-06-23vs SS-LGT REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Cabot / Kathy Hoskins vs Karen Allaire / Kelly Goodnough7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Peterson / Becki Jernigan vs Ginny Crise / Nancy Railey-Borchelt0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRobin DiCicco / Casey Clarke vs Nancy Hogue / Jane Lundwall6-3, 7-5
2025-06-16vs HRCA-N BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesHeidi Peterson / Dorothy Carr vs Jessica Field / Cortney Eisses2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesFarrah Johnson vs Lisa Anderson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMeghan Page / Casey Clarke vs Marie O'Neill / Naina Mackay5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Cabot / Kathy Hoskins vs Alison Cargo / Sheila Baker6-2, 6-3
2025-06-09vs GR GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesFarrah Johnson / Meghan Page vs Jacki Malone / Lauren Bloom6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKelly Callister vs Katie Bostwick6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBecki Jernigan / Robin DiCicco vs Kelly Meilstrup / Kimberly Fekete3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Hoskins / Heidi Peterson vs Celia Finnegan / Lori Strike2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-06-02vs KC-RH REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLisa Cabot / Dorothy Carr vs Janie Ramseier / Lori Goulding2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKelly Callister vs Carissa Hollander6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Lord / Becki Jernigan vs Deven Farris / Kelly Mair4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMeghan Page / Casey Clarke vs Elizabeth Crites / Danette Henderson6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Farrah Johnson
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Lisa Cabot
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Kelly Callister
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.88
Robin DiCicco
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Casey Clarke
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.84
Dorothy Carr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Kathy Hoskins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Meghan Page
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.64
Becki Jernigan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.59
Heidi Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Cabot + Kathy Hoskins4160% games+4.7% vs expected
Becki Jernigan + Robin DiCicco2447% gamesnot enough data
Meghan Page + Casey Clarke314 matchesnot enough data
Becki Jernigan + Heidi Peterson123 matchesnot enough data
Becki Jernigan + Farrah Johnson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Farrah Johnson
39W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
3.5
Lisa Cabot
47W–48L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.09
Kelly Callister
38W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Robin DiCicco
92W–73L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Casey Clarke
13W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Dorothy Carr
125W–82L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Kathy Hoskins
17W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
Meghan Page
27W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Becki Jernigan
107W–99L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Heidi Peterson
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.