Teams

PH GREEN

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs LEBTC GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBrooke Fox / Kathy Aarnio vs Meghan Page / Dorothy Carr7-5, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAbigail Smith vs Kelly Callister4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesTeri Markle / Wendy Hynes vs Lisa Cabot / Kathy Hoskins6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAmy Attwood / Molly Blake vs Robin DiCicco / Casey Clarke2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-07vs GR GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesBrooke Fox / Kathy Aarnio vs Jacki Malone / Lauren Bloom7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMerly Utsler vs Kelly Meilstrup2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAbigail Smith / Jennifer Fahey vs Lori Strike / Kimberly Fekete6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKate Funk / Catherine Rollhaus vs Celia Finnegan / Nicki Crippen6-1, 6-1
2025-06-30vs KC-RH REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesWendy Hynes / Marla Schroeder vs Renee Martinez / Gina Akins6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAbigail Smith vs Susan Bratschun2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Fahey / Kate Funk vs Lori Goulding / Janie Ramseier6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmy Attwood / Molly Blake vs Sherry Cronin / Danette Henderson6-2, 6-3
2025-06-23vs HRCA-N BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesJennifer Fahey / Teri Markle vs Jessica Field / Alison Cargo6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKate Funk vs Kathy Haberman6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWendy Hynes / Marla Schroeder vs Susie McKenzie / Marie O'Neill2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrooke Fox / Kathy Aarnio vs Pamela Abraham / Naina Mackay6-0, 6-3
2025-06-16vs KC-CC NAVYWon 40
W#1 DoublesWendy Hynes / Marla Schroeder vs Jean Pullen / Nathalia Urbano6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMerly Utsler vs Aura Leigh Ferguson6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrooke Fox / Teri Markle vs Judy Greco / Mary Wright6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCatherine Rollhaus / Kate Funk vs Sandra Copenhaver / Carla Minckley6-0, 6-2
2025-06-09vs LEBTC NAVYWon 40
W#1 DoublesMarla Schroeder / Wendy Hynes vs Amy Cimbura / Amy Allmon6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMolly Blake vs Julie Garrick6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Fahey / Teri Markle vs Winddee Stallings / Sarah Veitenhaus6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrooke Fox / Kathy Aarnio vs Kim Gayeski / Megan Fry6-2, 6-0
2025-06-02vs SS-LGT REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesMarla Schroeder / Wendy Hynes vs Karen Allaire / Ginny Crise6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMolly Blake vs Jennifer Ranum6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChristina Lawson / Merly Utsler vs Jane Lundwall / Kelly Goodnough6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Attwood / Catherine Rollhaus vs Nancy Railey-Borchelt / Toni Lapp7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Kathy Aarnio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.99
Jennifer Fahey
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Marla Schroeder
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.92
Molly Blake
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.92
Abigail Smith
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Merly Utsler
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Teri Markle
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Christina Lawson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Amy Attwood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Catherine Rollhaus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kate Funk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Lawson + Merly Utsler6259% games+3.5% vs expected
Jennifer Fahey + Teri Markle4257% games−1.8% vs expected
Marla Schroeder + Abigail Smith314 matchesnot enough data
Amy Attwood + Teri Markle224 matchesnot enough data
Abigail Smith + Jennifer Fahey224 matchesnot enough data
Marla Schroeder + Amy Attwood213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Attwood + Molly Blake213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Attwood + Merly Utsler303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kathy Aarnio
73W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Jennifer Fahey
27W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Marla Schroeder
28W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.97
Molly Blake
14W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.92
3
Abigail Smith
104W–86L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Merly Utsler
45W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Teri Markle
59W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Christina Lawson
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Amy Attwood
83W–71L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Catherine Rollhaus
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kate Funk
17W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.