Teams

USTA Campus-Alvarez

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE TriLevel 18 & Over SUMMER Day · 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-08vs Lake Cane-PhanWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Chang / Melissa Trickett vs Lily Kender / Mardy Goote6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-01vs Lake Cane-TuckermanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAli Goss / Lisa Chang vs Kerry Ginas / Stephanie Weinard3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKiera Phoebus / Michelle Lopez vs Bethany Traylor / Haley Nott7-6, 6-4
2025-07-25vs Ft Gatlin-Franks FusionWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Chang / Ali Goss vs Jennifer Dunn / Jennifer Hannigan6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-11vs USTA Campus-WuLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaura Nemes / Kiera Phoebus vs Ngan Hoang / Pamela Bravo1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Janet Jablonski
published
3.52
Laurene Booth
published
3.52
Kalani Meffe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Kim Knapp
published
3.38
Melissa Trickett
published
3.32
Kristine Neville
published
3.27
Lisa Chang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Kiera Phoebus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.19
Xiaohong Tu
published
3.17
Daisy Alvarez
published 3.5
3.09
Laura Nemes
published
3.08
Ali Goss
published 3.5
3.08
Michelle Lopez
published
3.06
Ella Simsek
published
3.03
Claire LaBrunerie
published 3.5
3.00
Amber Davis
published 3.5
Sara Llibre
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Trickett + Xiaohong Tu3245% games−6.4% vs expected
Melissa Trickett + Daisy Alvarez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Jablonski
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Laurene Booth
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.52
4
Kalani Meffe
59W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Kim Knapp
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.52
Melissa Trickett
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kristine Neville
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Lisa Chang
84W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Kiera Phoebus
70W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.20
Xiaohong Tu
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Daisy Alvarez
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Laura Nemes
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
3.5
Ali Goss
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.08
Michelle Lopez
19W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Ella Simsek
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
3.5
Claire LaBrunerie
15W–12L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Amber Davis
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Sara Llibre
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.