Teams

Hold at Love

Fall Adult 18 & Over Fun Flex Doubles · Flex 3.5

7 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Flex 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Serene ZiCornell
published
3.57
Sandi Varela
published
3.25
Priya Bhavsar
published
3.14
Margaret Gilburg
published
3.08
Marimel Ansdell
published
3.06
Sead Suskic
published
Martin Ansdell
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Serene ZiCornell
120W–69L career · no lines in 2022
<1%20%80%
4.11
Sandi Varela
51W–55L career · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.57
Priya Bhavsar
33W–52L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Margaret Gilburg
22W–45L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
Marimel Ansdell
35W–66L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Sead Suskic
30W–60L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
Martin Ansdell
8W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.