Teams

MIT: Umbricht/Edwards

2026 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 4.5 Women

22 players · average NTRP 4.36 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-16vs CP: Teillon/BruffettLost 03
L#1 DoublesRebecca Tessitore / Francesca Loricco vs Kristina Dorfman / Loren Dinger2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKate Alianiello / Carole Allers vs Sarah Thompson / Heather Rice1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Kaufman / Lauren Riether-Mills vs Jorrie Bruffett / Meghan Martucci6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesCarole Allers / Nan Cunningham vs Jennifer Monachino-Lapey / Francesca Silverman1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKendal Gaillard / Denise Sousa vs Jessica Ulrich / Amanda Bryan3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLiz Herr / Kate Alianiello vs Cristina Casati-Lewis / Sarah Haas6-3, 6-5
2026-07-07vs CP: Teillon/BruffettWon 31
W#1 DoublesKimelle McCarthy / Signe Breeden vs Anne Teillon / Kristina Dorfman7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLauren Sell vs Julie Colson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Condit / Christie Albera vs Gillian Scott / Kate Jennings6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Tessitore / Francesca Loricco vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesElena Miko / Signe Breeden vs Jill Markowitz / Sarah Haas6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNan Cunningham vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer MacAinag / Kimelle McCarthy vs Donna Morrison / Jessica Ulrich7-5, 5-4
W#3 DoublesJoyce MacAinag / Emily Bazelon vs Sara Watts / Amanda Bryan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesElena Miko / Julie Condit vs Heike Martens / Jacqueline Clark6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLauren Sell vs Francesca Silverman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAllison Umbricht / Kimelle McCarthy vs Heather Hecht / Jessica Ulrich3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Riether-Mills / Liz Herr vs Amanda Bryan / Sara Watts6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-04vs CP: Teillon/BruffettSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJoyce MacAinag / Jennifer MacAinag vs Anne Teillon / Hope Foley6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAllison Umbricht vs Julie Colson6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLiz Herr / Jane Kim vs Jorrie Bruffett / Annie O'Connor4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Kaufman / Kendal Gaillard vs Katharina Lewis / Heather Rice6-4, 7-6
2026-05-03vs CP: Teillon/BruffettWon 31
L#1 DoublesChristie Albera / Lauren Riether-Mills vs Hope Foley / Loren Dinger6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLauren Sell vs Sarah Thompson6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAllison Umbricht / Signe Breeden vs Jorrie Bruffett / Kristina Dorfman6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJane Kim / Liz Herr vs Gillian Scott / Victoria Williams6-0, 6-2
L#1 DoublesJulie Condit / Christie Albera vs Jill Markowitz / Jacqueline Clark4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAllison Umbricht vs Heather Hecht3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSigne Breeden / Emily Bazelon vs Carol Levine / Cristina Casati-Lewis6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer MacAinag / Joyce MacAinag vs Jennifer Monachino-Lapey / Laura Treanor Coury6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MIT: Umbricht/Edwards08211127247
2CP: No Aceholes: Teillon/Bruffett08141639304
3SOL:Party at the Net:Casati-Lewis/Ulrich08111944312

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Julie Condit
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.33
Elena Miko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.32
Jennifer MacAinag
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.30
Joyce MacAinag
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.26
Kimelle McCarthy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.25
Christie Albera
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.21
Denise Sousa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Signe Breeden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.19
Emily Bazelon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.14
Lauren Sell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.12
Rebecca Tessitore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.09
Lauren Riether-Mills
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.06
Allison Umbricht
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.06
Kendal Gaillard
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.00
Carole Allers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.93
Nan Cunningham
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.92
Liz Herr
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.89
Christina Marini
published 4
3.79
Francesca Loricco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Amy Kaufman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Jane Kim
published
Kate Alianiello
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimelle McCarthy + Jennifer MacAinag5069% games+9.3% vs expected
Lauren Riether-Mills + Lauren Sell10652% games+4.9% vs expected
Christie Albera + Julie Condit5266% games+4.4% vs expected
Jennifer MacAinag + Joyce MacAinag16757% games+3.4% vs expected
Christie Albera + Lauren Riether-Mills3445% games+2.6% vs expected
Rebecca Tessitore + Francesca Loricco9558% games+1.5% vs expected
Jennifer MacAinag + Julie Condit9657% games+1.0% vs expected
Emily Bazelon + Jennifer MacAinag4350% games−5.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Condit
103W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
4.37
Elena Miko
65W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
Jennifer MacAinag
64W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
Joyce MacAinag
18W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
4.30
Kimelle McCarthy
100W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Christie Albera
101W–61L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
4.25
4.5
Denise Sousa
79W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Signe Breeden
144W–103L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Emily Bazelon
52W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Lauren Sell
51W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
4.14
Rebecca Tessitore
67W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.12
Lauren Riether-Mills
137W–101L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Allison Umbricht
84W–60L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.06
Kendal Gaillard
95W–41L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
4.06
4.5
Carole Allers
186W–140L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
4.00
Nan Cunningham
42W–64L career · 2 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.93
Liz Herr
32W–26L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Christina Marini
24W–25L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
Francesca Loricco
64W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Amy Kaufman
40W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Jane Kim
143W–77L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kate Alianiello
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.