Teams

LATA40/Roberts/CTFC

2022 Adult 40 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 4.0 - Day

16 players · average NTRP 3.79 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 4.0 - Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Dale Roberts
published 4
3.87
Caty Garside
published 4
3.87
Jana Xanthakos
published
3.80
Cindy Edens
published 4
3.65
Tami Malatek
published
3.65
Eugenia Hardwick
published 4
3.63
Lisa Echols
published
3.53
Robin Simpson
published
3.48
Kay Wescott
published
3.48
Sherri Greenberg
published
3.45
Libby Tompkins
published
3.41
Erin Timmons
published 3.5
Amy Martin
published 3.5
Donna Bull
published 3.5
Elizabeth Deloach
published
Susie Wolfson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caty Garside + Jana Xanthakos5075% games+17.1% vs expected
Tami Malatek + Robin Simpson4455% games+8.7% vs expected
Tami Malatek + Lisa Echols6451% games+8.6% vs expected
Donna Bull + Eugenia Hardwick4163% games+5.9% vs expected
Dale Roberts + Jana Xanthakos12558% games+4.5% vs expected
Donna Bull + Tami Malatek4352% games−3.4% vs expected
Amy Martin + Dale Roberts2345% games−8.1% vs expected
Kay Wescott + Tami Malatek5066% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dale Roberts
39W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Caty Garside
83W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
Jana Xanthakos
42W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Cindy Edens
35W–26L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.80
Tami Malatek
45W–38L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Eugenia Hardwick
52W–58L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
Lisa Echols
61W–40L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
Robin Simpson
71W–44L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
Kay Wescott
66W–38L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
Sherri Greenberg
22W–24L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
Libby Tompkins
16W–34L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Erin Timmons
60W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Amy Martin
16W–20L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Donna Bull
34W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Elizabeth Deloach
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susie Wolfson
3W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.