Teams

OAKHURST CC 40AW3.5A-DT

2024 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-03-15vs MORAGA CC 40AW3.5A-DTLost 01
L#1 SinglesLana Rak vs Molly Harcos Tamariki1-6, 2-6
2024-02-28vs CLAREMONT R and S 40AW3.5A-DTLost 01
L#1 SinglesLana Rak vs Yasaman Massih1-6, 0-6
2024-01-23vs CLAREMONT R and S 40AW3.5A-DTLost 01
L#1 SinglesLana Rak vs Tammy Nikoltcheva1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Cecily Barclay
published 3.5
3.28
Janet Race
published
3.20
Tina Lugo
published
3.19
Debbie Hellmann
published 3.5
3.19
Nanny Tunnell
published
3.17
Catherine Kutsuris
published 3.5
3.10
Teri Frangie
published
3.09
Kimberly Autajay
published
3.09
Wendy Schofield
published
2.81
Lana Rak
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.65
Caryl Kohler
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Kutsuris + Kimberly Autajay123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cecily Barclay
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Janet Race
9W–21L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
Tina Lugo
10W–18L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Debbie Hellmann
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Nanny Tunnell
4W–15L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Catherine Kutsuris
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
Teri Frangie
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.10
Kimberly Autajay
3W–13L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.09
Wendy Schofield
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Lana Rak
57W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Caryl Kohler
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.