Teams

PKartes (Moutainbrook); Da Brook’rs

2024-2025 Winter Doubles Charlotte USTA FLEX League · 4.0 Men Doubles; Evening

4 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-01-25vs MJarzynski (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRudy Bombien / Patrick Kartes vs Christopher Chandler / Benjamin Shamanis6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-17vs EO'Bryan (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesPatrick Kartes / Thomas Dukes vs Randy Barrett / David LaGrega3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-12vs AMcWilliams (OPRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRudy Bombien / Patrick Kartes vs Brian Batas / Andrew McWilliams6-2, 7-5
2025-01-04vs MBoyce (Queens); BackhandsWon 10
W#1 DoublesRudy Bombien / Patrick Kartes vs Michael Boyce / Richard Schanzlin4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-12-15vs GCarney/RPoage (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRudy Bombien / Thomas Dukes vs Grant Carney / Ryan Poage2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-12-09vs KFranks (PPRSC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRudy Bombien / Patrick Kartes vs Kent Franks / Andrew Ross6-3, 6-3
2024-11-15vs MJarzynski (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPatrick Kartes / Thomas Dukes vs Michal Jarzynski / Christopher Chandler3-6, 3-6
2024-11-07vs EO'Bryan (Weddington)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRudy Bombien / Heyward Bouknight vs David LaGrega / Randy Barrett3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men Doubles; Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Rudy Bombien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Thomas Dukes
published
3.54
Patrick Kartes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Heyward Bouknight
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heyward Bouknight + Patrick Kartes13162% games+13.0% vs expected
Rudy Bombien + Patrick Kartes231155% games−2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rudy Bombien
86W–68L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Thomas Dukes
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
4
Patrick Kartes
103W–52L career · 6 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Heyward Bouknight
51W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.