Teams

Hot Shots

2024 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-06vs MG1DubLost 01
L#1 DoublesNellie Bozick / Jill Schultz vs Aleana Harris / Geeta McCormack0-6, 2-6
2024-08-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesJill Schultz / Nellie Bozick vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-23vs Doubles TroublesLost 01
L#1 DoublesNellie Bozick / Jill Schultz vs Celia Evans / Corinne Crabs5-7, 6-7
2024-07-18vs CrushersLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela King / Nellie Bozick vs Christine Henn / Wendy Champagne4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-07-11vs RoddyWon 10
W#1 DoublesNellie Bozick / Jo Gartenberg vs Anne Roddy / Amy Knobbs6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-01vs C&CLost 01
L#1 DoublesNellie Bozick / Pamela King vs Christine Holm / Courtney Williams0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Nellie Bozick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jill Schultz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Jo Gartenberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Pamela King
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jo Gartenberg + Nellie Bozick4151% games+4.5% vs expected
Pamela King + Nellie Bozick134 matchesnot enough data
Jill Schultz + Jo Gartenberg314 matchesnot enough data
Jill Schultz + Nellie Bozick123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Nellie Bozick
51W–38L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Jill Schultz
43W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Jo Gartenberg
41W–56L career · 1 line in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Pamela King
47W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.