← Search

Jill Schultz

Renton, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
76 matches · 43W–33L · seasons 2019–2025
Where Jill sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Jill is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jill has been a steady 3.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

2.53.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jill has gone from the 68th to the 20th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
54.7%
29W–24L · 51.2% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 54.7% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 66.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history76 matches
L
Lindsey McCallum / Lindsey Nelson
2025-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Silver
−0.004about as expected — took 44% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Susan James / Marni Mills
2025-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Takako Chavez
−0.024below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Emma King / Kara Rozanski
2025-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Takako Chavez
+0.009about as expected — took 59% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Margie Starnes / Suzanne Vannatter
2025-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charu Bogdan
−0.026below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-02-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Jordt
−0.031below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Mona Elsing / Leona Zamora
2025-02-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Valarie Kaye
−0.017below expectation — took 40% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
Juliet Wu / In Young Jung
2025-01-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Silver
+0.072better than expected — took 92% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Diane Kuenster / Bonnie Currey
2024-10-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pam Rasanen
+0.008better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-10-20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelly Silver
+0.008about as expected — took 59% of games against 55% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2024-09-29 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Charu Bogdan
−0.052below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Aleana Harris / Geeta McCormack
2024-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nellie Bozick
−0.088below expectation — took 14% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
N/A
2024-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nellie Bozick
+0.083better than expected — took 100% of games against 54% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.