Teams

LTFC GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-29vs HRCA ORANGEWon 21
L#1 DoublesTracy Pursell / Joy Coulter-Brown vs Shannon Porter / Teresa Orr4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCheryl Sanders / Carol Lugo vs Judy Monahan / Laura Hoganson6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDebbie Maloney / Cindy Wells vs Amy Tharp / Lynn Hoppe6-1, 6-1
2022-06-22vs PCC ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarol Stevens / Patti Coker vs Ann Siebert / Tina Newlin7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Baer / Debra Benge vs Joyce Mendes / Judy Jackson5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDebbie Maloney / Cindy Wells vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-15vs SSLT REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnn Baer / Debra Benge vs Allison Langenderfer / Fauna MacKillip6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDianne Leoni / Carol Lugo vs Virginia Foster / Nancy Hong6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDebbie Maloney / MaryBeth Doerr vs Carol Manlove / Mary Clare Hainsworth6-3, 6-3
2022-06-08vs PRC BLUEWon 20
W#2 DoublesTracy Pursell / Joy Coulter-Brown vs Laura Jones / Lisa Rosen5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Lugo / Dianne Leoni vs Patricia Eddington / Leslie Hathaway6-1, 6-1
2022-06-01vs HG BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Pursell / Patti Coker vs Jackie Nelsen / Pamela Osborne6-0, 6-2
2022-05-25vs HRCA BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesCheryl Sanders / Karol Stevens vs Kathy Dudek / Dana Anderson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarol Lugo / Debra Benge vs Judy Mickelson / Nicola Zalkind6-2, 6-2
2022-05-18vs CACI REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesCarol Lugo / Dianne Leoni vs Bernadette Rottschafer / Diane Wells1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Sanders / Joy Coulter-Brown vs Joby Koren / Jennifer Benson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-11vs HRCA ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesKarol Stevens / Patti Coker vs Leslie Dowaschinski / Teresa Orr6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarol Lugo / Joy Coulter-Brown vs Beth Beers / Sally Heaton6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCindy Wells / Debbie Maloney vs Laura Hoganson / Judy Monahan6-1, 7-6
2022-05-04vs PCC ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesTracy Pursell / Joy Coulter-Brown vs Ann Siebert / Tina Newlin7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKarol Stevens / Debra Benge vs Judy Jackson / Yvonne Knapp6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDianne Leoni / Cindy Wells vs Diane Matava / Nancy Sharpe6-2, 6-2
2022-04-27vs SSLT REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoy Coulter-Brown / Tracy Pursell vs Virginia Foster / Nancy Hong6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKarol Stevens / Cheryl Sanders vs Kimberly Parks / Katy Adler6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMaryBeth Doerr / Debbie Maloney vs Maria Hush / Fauna MacKillip1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Karol Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #3 Doubles 9% · published 4
3.58
Debbie Maloney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Dianne Leoni
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Joy Coulter-Brown
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Carol Lugo
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.25
Cindy Wells
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Ann Baer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Cheryl Sanders
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Tracy Pursell
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Debra Benge
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.67
MaryBeth Doerr
published
Patti Coker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Sanders + Cindy Wells4255% games+8.6% vs expected
Joy Coulter-Brown + Tracy Pursell28956% games+3.5% vs expected
Carol Lugo + Debbie Maloney7559% games−0.5% vs expected
Carol Lugo + Cheryl Sanders14557% games−0.9% vs expected
Debra Benge + Ann Baer202249% games−0.9% vs expected
Patti Coker + Tracy Pursell5849% games−2.7% vs expected
Tracy Pursell + Cindy Wells2444% gamesnot enough data
Joy Coulter-Brown + Cindy Wells134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karol Stevens
130W–55L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Debbie Maloney
108W–67L career · 5 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Dianne Leoni
53W–32L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Joy Coulter-Brown
102W–86L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Carol Lugo
128W–91L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Cindy Wells
64W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ann Baer
72W–58L career · 1 line in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Cheryl Sanders
133W–123L career · 4 lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Tracy Pursell
92W–79L career · 5 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Debra Benge
107W–104L career · 4 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
MaryBeth Doerr
48W–96L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
Patti Coker
27W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.