Teams

LT ORANGE

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-12vs HMTC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesLynn Arenson / Merril Tyler vs Cheri Gipson / Ann Smerud6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMel Fernandez / Becky Olson vs Rosalie Krammer / Mary Wilson3-6, 3-6
2021-07-05vs LVTA CRIMSONLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynn Arenson / Merril Tyler vs Bonita Hanner / Anita Helin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPriscilla Dressen / Dee Woodcock vs Sonda Huhta / Paige Woodard5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBecky Olson / Mel Fernandez vs Valerie Hecker / Jeannette Popp5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-28vs MLF BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Dressen / Dee Woodcock vs Elina George / Carrie Galyardt3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLori Buderus / Lynn Arenson vs Erin Hauser-Roe / Darla Roselle1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMel Fernandez / Becky Olson vs Karen Beach / Konnie Kosek6-2, 6-4
2021-06-21vs HMTC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Dressen / Kaili Young vs Cheri Gipson / Debra Netzel3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLynn Arenson vs CYNDI ROTHMAN6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMel Fernandez / Becky Olson vs Renee Adams / De Ann George4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-06-14vs LVTA CRIMSONLost 01
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Dressen / Lynn Arenson vs Bonita Hanner / Sonda Huhta2-6, 6-7
2021-06-07vs MLF BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Dressen / Lori Buderus vs Elina George / Jennifer Fields3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMerril Tyler / Lynn Arenson vs Annette Vizena / Erin Hauser-Roe2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Kaili Young
published 4.5
3.96
Lori Buderus
published 4
3.88
Lynn Arenson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Dee Woodcock
published 4
3.52
Priscilla Dressen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.51
Becky Olson
published 4
3.37
Mel Fernandez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Liz Rose
published
Merril Tyler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Buderus + Priscilla Dressen2350% games−1.9% vs expected
Priscilla Dressen + Lynn Arenson1442% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kaili Young
68W–60L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
4.24
4
Lori Buderus
55W–25L career · no lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Lynn Arenson
84W–58L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Dee Woodcock
13W–22L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Priscilla Dressen
92W–113L career · 5 lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
Becky Olson
22W–30L career · type A · no lines in 2021
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Mel Fernandez
41W–68L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
3.37
Liz Rose
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Merril Tyler
5W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.