Teams

What are you lobbing about?

2022 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-06-21vs Backhanded ComplimentsLost 01
L#1 DoublesTundra McDougal / Frances Stern Dudley vs Carolyn Meador / Laura Kiracofe6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2022-06-07Lost 01
L#2 DoublesFrances Stern Dudley / Sandra Holmes vs Nancy Foster / Danielle Horras6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2022-05-24vs Backhanded ComplimentsWon 10
W#2 DoublesJudy DeBoer / Frances Stern Dudley vs Carol Wingate / Laura Kiracofe7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1What are you lobbing about?7117718184

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Paula Lawson
published 4
2.96
Ellen German
published 3
2.65
Colleen Trese
published 3
2.44
Ashley Locke
published 3
Frances Stern Dudley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.00
Michele Bowden
published 2.5
Judy DeBoer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mary-Katherine Ekins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sandra Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Tundra McDougal
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Holmes + Michele Bowden41232% gamesnot enough data
Judy DeBoer + Sandra Holmes11333% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Holmes + Colleen Trese21234% gamesnot enough data
Judy DeBoer + Michele Bowden21034% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Locke + Mary-Katherine Ekins2840% gamesnot enough data
Colleen Trese + Tundra McDougal224 matchesnot enough data
Judy DeBoer + Tundra McDougal213 matchesnot enough data
Colleen Trese + Michele Bowden213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Paula Lawson
203W–118L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
3
Ellen German
88W–54L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Colleen Trese
71W–123L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
2.65
3
Ashley Locke
32W–60L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
2.44
2.5
Frances Stern Dudley
4W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Michele Bowden
51W–106L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Judy DeBoer
36W–130L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary-Katherine Ekins
46W–61L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Holmes
17W–107L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tundra McDougal
50W–77L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.