← Teams

CRRC-Ferrer/Berkman

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.83 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Tarynn Berkman
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.05
Amy Bucher
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.98
Michele Sutherland
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 4
—
Jane Paulsen
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Joy Kolesnikoff
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.04
Donna Walker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results7 ties
2020-03-01Won 4–1
W#1 DoublesAmy Bucher / Autumn Gray vs Karen Kraus / Sarah Larson6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTarynn Berkman vs Lyndsey Matteson6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmanda Wiley / Joy Kolesnikoff vs Mary Priester / Cathleen Lang6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMichele Sutherland vs Lia Irvin6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLinda Castaneda / Jane Paulsen vs Michelle Johnson / Christa Mazariegos6-4, 7-5
2020-02-16Won 4–0
W#1 SinglesTarynn Berkman vs Mera Cosgrove6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMegan McCarter / Amy Bucher vs Karen Gee / Mary Jane Toolson6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJoy Kolesnikoff vs Katrina Phillips6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichele Sutherland / Madeleine Maier vs Teresa Darling / Lynn Hendrix6-1, 6-3
2020-02-15Split 2–2
W#1 SinglesTarynn Berkman vs Mary Green-Zwemke6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMegan McCarter / Amy Bucher vs Eileen Hart / Donna Boje7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJoy Kolesnikoff vs Angelina Warriner6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichele Sutherland / Madeleine Maier vs Tonya Halog / Vivian Nguyen6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2020-01-25Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesMegan McCarter / Amy Bucher vs Dar Dragoon / Reiko Maeda6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTarynn Berkman vs Roksolana Shyyka6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLinda Castaneda / Jane Paulsen vs Sarah Mutal / Angie Gordon6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichele Sutherland / Madeleine Maier vs Jennifer Steward / Valerie Regan6-1, 6-0
2020-01-18Won 3–1
L#1 DoublesLinda Castaneda / Donna Walker vs Vicki Blunt / Pamela Minor6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Bucher / Amanda Wiley vs Shelley Hutley / Cheryl Geisler6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesTarynn Berkman vs Sarah Kaufman4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMegan McCarter / Michele Sutherland vs Elizabeth Wedan / Heidi Kjos6-3, 7-5
2020-01-11Won 2–1
W#1 SinglesTarynn Berkman vs Stephanie von Allmen6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJoy Kolesnikoff vs Carolyn Bachhuber6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Bucher / Amanda Wiley vs Catherine Leedy / Kim Wright6-4, 6-3
2020-01-04Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesMegan McCarter / Amy Bucher vs Susan McMullin / Natalya Ramras7-6, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJoy Kolesnikoff vs Jennifer Bane7-6, 7-5
W#2 SinglesTarynn Berkman vs Nina Nguyen6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDonna Walker / Madeleine Maier vs Pam Weider / Tina Clancy6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Tarynn Berkman
78W–28L career
7%93%0%
4.05
4.5
Amy Bucher
179W–78L career
10%90%0%
4.05
4
Michele Sutherland
332W–175L career
0%87%13%
3.98
3.5
Jane Paulsen
84W–62L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Joy Kolesnikoff
33W–45L career
3%96%0%
3.22
3
Donna Walker
12W–38L career
0%64%36%
3.04

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.