Teams

CLAREMONT CC CW6.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-10-28vs CLAREMONT R and S CW6.5ALost 02
L#1 DoublesBecky McKeen / Amy Jones vs Susan Kung / Judy Shanks5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Kevane / Anna Acquistapace vs Erinn Nahid / Anne Wheeler3-6, 2-6
2025-10-24vs SAN PABLO PK CW6.5ALost 02
L#1 DoublesJacque Jumper / Amy Jones vs Andrea Belgrade / Sonya Jubb3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTonya Antonucci / Tara Dietrick vs Kaia Yang / Eileen Trieu1-6, 1-6
2025-10-21vs LANEY TA/ENCINAL HS CW6.5ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesCourtney Azad / Jessica Kelly vs Sheila Kilty / Melissa Isola6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJacque Jumper / Susan McLaughlin vs Yulia Costello / Bryn Strong6-7, 3-6
2025-10-12vs SPANISH BAY CW6.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristina Frodsham / Becky McKeen vs Ann Artz / Kirstie Wilde4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-10-12vs CLAREMONT R and S CW6.5ALost 03
L#1 DoublesJacque Jumper / Amy Jones vs Susan Zhao / Janicke Polumbo6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan McLaughlin / Cindy Kim vs Laura Guevara / Anita Bloch1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAddie Bidder / Sara Johnson vs Kye Heinstein / Denise Yamamoto3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-09-30vs EL CERRITO TC/ARLINGTON PK CW6.5ASplit 11
W#2 DoublesCourtney Azad / Tara Dietrick vs Helen Vasquez / Xuan Nguyen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAddie Bidder / Susan McLaughlin vs Tirzah Williams / Jessica Jang2-6, 3-6
2025-09-27vs CLAREMONT R and S CW6.5BWon 21
L#1 DoublesJacque Jumper / Debra Underwood vs Forooza Baradar / Rebecca Shea3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAddie Bidder / Catherine Kevane vs Olga Burkhina / Florence Chun6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTonya Antonucci / Tara Dietrick vs Yasaman Massih / Shirley Rexrode6-4, 6-3
2025-09-16vs HARBOR BAY CW6.5ALost 12
L#1 DoublesCourtney Azad / Becky McKeen vs Lily Gilels / Katherine Hwang3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Underwood / Cindy Kim vs Kay Kolos McCubbin / Kaylee Chan7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTonya Antonucci / Susan McLaughlin vs Dana Takahashi / Laura Sumrall6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-09-07vs RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK CW6.5ALost 12
W#1 DoublesStephanie Brendel / Amy Jones vs Belinda Castillo / Melissa Sano6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan McLaughlin / Katie Colbert vs April Mundy / Emilie Linick7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnna Acquistapace / Tara Dietrick vs Corri Synak / Laura Blanton2-6, 6-7
2025-08-26vs WASHINGTON PK CW6.5ALost 02
L#2 DoublesSusan McLaughlin / Sara Johnson vs Sara Bremer / Amelia Spinrad5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCindy Kim / Tonya Antonucci vs Ashley Pellouchoud / Marilyn Pellouchoud3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Courtney Azad
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.34
Stephanie Brendel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Jacque Jumper
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.95
Addie Bidder
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Susan McLaughlin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Tonya Antonucci
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Catherine Kevane
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Becky McKeen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Debra Underwood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Tara Dietrick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Angela Anastasi
published 3
2.69
Anna Acquistapace
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Valerie Reilly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Dietrick + Anna Acquistapace044 matchesnot enough data
Jacque Jumper + Stephanie Brendel123 matchesnot enough data
Valerie Reilly + Tonya Antonucci033 matchesnot enough data
Tara Dietrick + Tonya Antonucci213 matchesnot enough data
Addie Bidder + Susan McLaughlin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Courtney Azad
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Stephanie Brendel
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Jacque Jumper
4W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Addie Bidder
13W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Susan McLaughlin
9W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Tonya Antonucci
10W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Catherine Kevane
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Becky McKeen
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Debra Underwood
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tara Dietrick
10W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Angela Anastasi
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Anna Acquistapace
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Valerie Reilly
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.