Teams

YOURS!

2026 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

17 players · average NTRP 3.41 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-16vs Aloha Beaches 18+Lost 02
L#2 DoublesEsther Rowland / Jamie Hammond vs Kimberlee Megale / Michele Inghram3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLauren Osburn vs Susan Riley1-6, 2-6
2026-06-11vs Play It ForwardSplit 11
L#1 SinglesErica Gonzalez vs Cathy Wood7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFariss Mcgee / Esther Rowland vs Saundra Coronado / Monica Sorensen7-5, 6-3
2026-06-02vs Net Positive 18+Won 20
W#2 DoublesAlice Livesay / Esther Rowland vs Angela Abbott / Kathy Hansen6-1, 7-5
W#2 SinglesLauren Osburn vs Krystal Patel6-1, 6-1
2026-05-28vs Nice Hits 18+Lost 02
L#1 SinglesErica Gonzalez vs Molly Otter3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAngel Marie Bowie / Esther Rowland vs Melissa Nielsen / Amy Boettcher6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-05-26vs Simply SmashingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMonica Reagan / Angel Marie Bowie vs Kristin Mumford / Jill Peterson3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLeah Hart / Esther Rowland vs Jennifer Rusk / Christine Cannon6-2, 6-4
2026-05-19vs Nothing But Love youngstersLost 02
L#1 SinglesLauren Osburn vs Allison Young2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesErica Gonzalez vs Jenessa Taylor6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Mandy Bergstrom
published 3.5
3.44
Jessika Hulewsky
published 3.5
3.26
Fariss Mcgee
published 3.5
3.25
Alice Livesay
published 3.5
3.22
Erica Gonzalez
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Nelda Denton
published
3.20
Karie Pappani
published 3.5
3.18
Carrie Fischer
published 3.5
3.09
3.04
Angel Marie Bowie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Esther Rowland
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.03
Monica Reagan
published
2.98
Gabrielle Bohdel
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Jamie Hammond
published 3
2.80
Leah Hart
published
Lauren Osburn
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Michelle Francel
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Bee Ping Ong Mullin + Gabrielle Bohdel6265% games+14.4% vs expected
Mandy Bergstrom + Jessika Hulewsky21561% games+10.4% vs expected
Angel Marie Bowie + Leah Hart101249% games−2.9% vs expected
Nelda Denton + Fariss Mcgee5746% games−3.1% vs expected
Angel Marie Bowie + Monica Reagan4255% gamesnot enough data
Leah Hart + Mandy Bergstrom3352% gamesnot enough data
Fariss Mcgee + Wendy Bee Ping Ong Mullin1442% gamesnot enough data
Angel Marie Bowie + Nelda Denton044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mandy Bergstrom
61W–28L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Jessika Hulewsky
76W–37L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Fariss Mcgee
79W–93L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Alice Livesay
110W–29L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Erica Gonzalez
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
Nelda Denton
88W–106L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Karie Pappani
153W–139L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Carrie Fischer
77W–53L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Wendy Bee Ping Ong Mullin
63W–41L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Angel Marie Bowie
61W–93L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.04
3.5
Esther Rowland
82W–121L career · 5 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
Monica Reagan
106W–95L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Gabrielle Bohdel
51W–31L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%55%44%
2.98
3
Jamie Hammond
31W–57L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.83
Leah Hart
52W–93L career · no lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.80
Lauren Osburn
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Francel
13W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.