Teams

Anthony's Aces

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.44 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-05-08vs Dream CrushersWon 40
W#1 DoublesJoe Buckwalter / Anthony Brooks vs Russ Baker / Charleston Yu6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesWilly Stone vs Gregory Bidwell6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrock Steller / Marco Terracciano vs William Cotton / Patrick Rumley6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPAUL RISSE / Zachary Vincent vs William Bittner / Chris Owens6-3, 6-2
2021-05-08vs Dream CrushersWon 31
W#1 DoublesWilly Stone / Joe Buckwalter vs William Bittner / Charleston Yu4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMarco Terracciano vs Russ Baker6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAnthony Brooks / Adam Choi vs Michael Leonard / Gregory Bidwell3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrock Steller / PAUL RISSE vs Chris Owens / Alan Green6-3, 6-2
2021-05-07vs Dream CrushersWon 40
W#1 DoublesWilly Stone / Marco Terracciano vs Gary Cox / Russ Baker6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJoe Buckwalter vs Patrick Rumley6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAdam Choi / Zachary Vincent vs William Cotton / Michael Leonard6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrock Steller / PAUL RISSE vs Alan Green / Charleston Yu1-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Anthony's Aces03111571
2Dream Crushers0311123133

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Joe Buckwalter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.65
Marco Terracciano
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.33
Adam Choi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Zachary Vincent
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Brock Steller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Anthony Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.87
Willy Stone
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.47
PAUL RISSE
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Willy Stone + Marco Terracciano11557% games+9.5% vs expected
Joe Buckwalter + Anthony Brooks271058% games+3.3% vs expected
Zachary Vincent + PAUL RISSE224 matchesnot enough data
Willy Stone + Zachary Vincent123 matchesnot enough data
Willy Stone + Adam Choi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Joe Buckwalter
88W–77L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Marco Terracciano
67W–44L career · 3 lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Adam Choi
69W–37L career · type S · 2 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Zachary Vincent
32W–30L career · type S · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Brock Steller
66W–51L career · type M · 3 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Anthony Brooks
110W–108L career · 2 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Willy Stone
110W–70L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
2.87
2.5
PAUL RISSE
46W–64L career · 3 lines in 2021
0%59%41%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.