Teams

KHart (Blakeney)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-12vs AAdams (OPRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKari McGregor / Michelle Wright vs Heather Shaw / Amy Adams2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKaty Hart / Lee Page vs Jennifer Gardiner / Virginia Jenkins1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTara Tyson / Smita Thakur vs Barbara Salvucci / Kelly Floyd1-6, 3-6
2022-04-27vs SReynolds (Queens Complex)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesChristina Peterson / Meghan Bartholomew vs Debbie Titlestad / Kerri Good4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSmita Thakur vs Monica Erb4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaty Hart / Kari McGregor vs Tasha Sheehy / Caroline Pickup1-6, 2-6
2022-04-20vs MMcDaniel (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSmita Thakur / Kari McGregor vs Karen Rocchio / Dora Burdzinska-Drezek1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKaty Hart / Lisa Craig vs Krista Reardon / Trista Holwager2-6, 1-6
2022-04-13vs AAdams (OPRC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesIndia Branker / Christina Peterson vs Heather Shaw / Rosemary Hill3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLee Page / Kari McGregor vs Barbara Salvucci / Lisa Kane6-4, 6-2
2022-04-06vs SReynolds (Queens Complex)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Shea / Kari McGregor vs Mindy Merchant / Caroline Pickup2-6, 2-6
2022-04-04vs AAdams (OPRC)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesIndia Branker / Christina Peterson vs Virginia Jenkins / Lisa Kane6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLisa Craig / Eden Serekeberhan vs Amy Adams / Leslie Peterson3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLee Page / Smita Thakur vs Heather Shaw / Rosemary Hill3-6, 1-6
2022-03-30vs MMcDaniel (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesMeghan Bartholomew vs Cameron Green5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSmita Thakur / Eden Serekeberhan vs Anna Kamenova / Christine Pringle7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-03-08vs SReynolds (Queens Complex)Won 21
L#1 DoublesMichelle Wright / Kari McGregor vs Christine Richards / Caroline Pickup2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMeghan Bartholomew vs Liz Barton7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesIndia Branker / Christina Peterson vs Brantlee Green / Sharon Roberts6-4, 6-4
2022-03-02vs MMcDaniel (Life Time)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesChristina Peterson / Smita Thakur vs Marie McDaniel / Dora Burdzinska-Drezek1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMeghan Bartholomew vs Cameron Green7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesIndia Branker / Lee Page vs Trista Holwager / Christine Pringle6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.60
Meghan Bartholomew
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
3.94
Christina Peterson
published 4.5
3.85
Donna DePollo
published 4
3.74
Lee Page
published
3.68
Smita Thakur
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Mary Shea
published
3.60
Katy Hart
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.57
India Branker
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Lisa Craig
published
3.42
Kari McGregor
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.39
Eden Serekeberhan
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.38
Tara Tyson
published
3.32
Michele Olsen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

India Branker + Smita Thakur5840% games+1.4% vs expected
Smita Thakur + Katy Hart8650% games−0.5% vs expected
Tara Tyson + Katy Hart4546% games−2.9% vs expected
Lee Page + Donna DePollo2347% games−4.3% vs expected
Kari McGregor + Katy Hart11135% games−15.8% vs expected
Kari McGregor + India Branker4645% gamesnot enough data
Eden Serekeberhan + Kari McGregor2540% gamesnot enough data
Lee Page + Katy Hart044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Meghan Bartholomew
66W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
4.60
4.5
Christina Peterson
100W–61L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.94
4
Donna DePollo
108W–74L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
Lee Page
47W–45L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Smita Thakur
79W–68L career · 6 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Mary Shea
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Katy Hart
65W–130L career · 6 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
India Branker
47W–71L career · 9 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
Lisa Craig
18W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Kari McGregor
54W–96L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Eden Serekeberhan
67W–64L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
Tara Tyson
5W–21L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
3.38
Michele Olsen
33W–42L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.