← Teams

Capital Crush

2023 NOVA Singles Women · NOVA Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-15vs Team Great FallsWon 1–0
W#1 SinglesLaura Jairam vs Hilary Dixon6-4, 6-1
2023-11-07vs Loosely StrungWon 2–0
W#2 SinglesLaura Jairam vs Karen Keller6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesChandra Bittner vs Ingrid Hunsicker6-4, 6-0
2023-10-24vs Net Jobs 3.0Won 1–0
W#2 SinglesChandra Bittner vs Xuan Du4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-18Won 1–0
W#3 SinglesLaura Jairam vs Patricia Michel-Vargas6-0, 6-1
2023-10-13vs Team Great FallsWon 1–0
W#2 SinglesLaura Jairam vs Alison Lopez6-3, 6-1
2023-10-06vs Loosely StrungWon 1–0
W#3 SinglesChandra Bittner vs Elle Sullivant6-3, 6-0
2023-10-01vs Sassy SmashersLost 0–1
L#2 SinglesLaura Jairam vs Marissa Schmauch Womble1-6, 6-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Laura Jairam
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Elisa Wolf
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Claire Bosch Zuazo
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Monica Popp
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Chandra Bittner
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Noeline Arul
published —
2.31
Sandra Kim
published —
2.25
Joi Ruther
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Popp + Elisa Wolf6–165% gamesnot enough data
Joi Ruther + Chandra Bittner4–04 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Laura Jairam
184W–85L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Elisa Wolf
177W–86L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Claire Bosch Zuazo
57W–27L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Monica Popp
75W–47L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Chandra Bittner
112W–61L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
—
Noeline Arul
16W–46L career · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
2.88
—
Sandra Kim
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Joi Ruther
94W–122L career · no lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.