Teams

Loosely Strung

2023 NOVA Singles Women · NOVA Singles 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-08vs Sassy SmashersLost 01
L#3 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Ayako Doi1-6, 3-6
2023-11-07vs Capital CrushLost 01
L#3 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Chandra Bittner4-6, 0-6
2023-10-30Won 10
W#1 SinglesKendra McQuillan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-22vs Net Jobs 3.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesSandy Lucidi vs Hiam Eljazzar3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Heidi Davis6-1, 6-2
2023-10-11vs Sassy SmashersLost 01
L#2 SinglesElle Sullivant vs Ayako Doi6-7
2023-10-06vs Capital CrushLost 01
L#3 SinglesElle Sullivant vs Chandra Bittner3-6, 0-6
2023-09-30vs Net Jobs 3.0Won 10
W#1 SinglesKendra McQuillan vs Rui Liu4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-09-15vs Team Great FallsSplit 11
W#2 SinglesSandy Lucidi vs Effie Hoffman7-5, 3-4
L#3 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Jennifer Decker2-6, 1-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Kendra McQuillan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Deborah Williams
published 3
2.85
Ingrid Hunsicker
usually #3 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.75
Sandy Lucidi
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.73
Elle Sullivant
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.70
Karen Keller
published
2.59
Linda Dinga
published
Vanessa Ogilvie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elle Sullivant + Sandy Lucidi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kendra McQuillan
165W–90L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.45
3
Deborah Williams
29W–35L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Ingrid Hunsicker
113W–175L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Sandy Lucidi
38W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Elle Sullivant
78W–157L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Karen Keller
6W–16L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Linda Dinga
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.59
Kerilyn McMichael-Beltran
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vanessa Ogilvie
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.