Teams

Ostlund 8.0 40+ S26

2026 Mixed 40 & OVER Summer · 8.0 MIXED S26

14 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesJon Kruse / Stephanie Crowl vs Leif Johnson / Susan Nixon6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Johnson / Brett Pauley vs David Komula / Jennifer Lewis2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesChristina Burns / Per Ostlund vs Amanda Herr / Anil Kumar Kanathur0-6, 4-6
2026-06-26vs BrauerWon 20
W#1 DoublesPhillip Chase / Michele Zens vs David Brauer / Susanna Ferlito6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAustin Seaverson / Rachel Lund vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-19vs Proepper Kreutzer Summer 40+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesChristina Burns / Jon Kruse vs Hylan McLaughlin / Mary O'Brien5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Johnson / Brett Pauley vs Melonie Sebring / Daniel Sebring6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPaul Jackson / Joanna Poinar vs Amy Hove / Jo Janssens4-6, 1-6
2026-06-12vs Yee 40+ SummerLost 12
W#1 DoublesAyumu Kido / Joanna Poinar vs Kris Smitobol / Julie Bowles6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlexis Siegel-Carlson / Jon Kruse vs Michael Vecellio / Megan Murray-Bennett3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesStephanie Crowl / Brett Pauley vs Danielle Genz / Thomas Genz1-6, 4-6
2026-06-05vs HANSEN 40 Plus 8.0 SummerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJon Kruse / Alexis Siegel-Carlson vs Paul Jilek / Lisa Ogren3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrett Pauley / Stephanie Crowl vs Benjamin Colburn / Patricia White6-3, 6-2
L#1 DoublesAustin Seaverson / Michele Zens vs Shravan Pargal / Jacqueline Williams4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJon Kruse / Alexis Siegel-Carlson vs Gregg Sampson / Ann Cadwallader6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPaul Jackson / Sarah Tuel vs Katie Pargal / Doug MacGibbon1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesPhillip Chase / Sarah Tuel vs John Anderson / Kim Bartz6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBrett Pauley / Stephanie Crowl vs Susan Nixon / David Komula2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristina Burns / Per Ostlund vs Amanda Herr / Anil Kumar Kanathur4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-05-08vs BrauerWon 20
W#1 DoublesAustin Seaverson / Michele Zens vs Matthew Crosby / Susanna Ferlito3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAyumu Kido / Alexis Siegel-Carlson vs Shelley Andrew / Vijay Andrew6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 8.0 MIXED S26
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HANSEN 40 Plus 8.0 Summer8021311179
2Yee 40+ Summer7119518198
3Bartz/Tollefson Fireballers 8.0 40+44131127244
4Proepper Kreutzer Summer 40+3591531231
5Brauer2551632211
6Pargal: Friday Nights Under the Lights2671737248
7Ostlund 8.0 40+ S261671430197

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Austin Seaverson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Phillip Chase
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Ayumu Kido
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Brett Pauley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.74
Paul Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Alexis Siegel-Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Christina Burns
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Stephanie Crowl
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.59
Joanna Poinar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
Rachel Lund
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Per Ostlund
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.56
Jon Kruse
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.46
Sarah Tuel
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.28
Michele Zens
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jon Kruse + Michele Zens6164% gamesnot enough data
Jon Kruse + Alexis Siegel-Carlson123 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Crowl + Brett Pauley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Austin Seaverson
12W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Phillip Chase
112W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
4
Ayumu Kido
10W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
4.04
4
Brett Pauley
25W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Paul Jackson
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Alexis Siegel-Carlson
26W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Christina Burns
60W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Stephanie Crowl
34W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Joanna Poinar
18W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
Rachel Lund
54W–46L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
Per Ostlund
14W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
Jon Kruse
37W–38L career · 5 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.56
Sarah Tuel
75W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Michele Zens
36W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.