Teams

HTC:All Mixed Up:Schumsky/de Baeck

2026 NCT Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 55 & Over Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 13 3:00 PM
Hartford Tennis Club
L#1 DoublesAnthony Wion / Karen Piazza vs Scott Snow / Joy Fausey3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Friedman / Ann Marie Schumsky vs Andrew Miller / Esther Aronson1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChris Drew / Lynn Siebert vs Rob Keppel / Elizabeth Keppel6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAnthony Wion / Lynn Siebert vs Esther Aronson / Kevin Imbt4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Friedman / Debra Raviv vs Rebecca Fishman / Andrew Miller6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChris Drew / Monica Katzen vs Jennifer Moffa / Peter Suttmeier3-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesAnthony Wion / Karen Piazza vs Kevin Imbt / Deborah Sullivan6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDebra Raviv / David Gordon vs Andrew Miller / Rebecca Fishman5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesFrederic de Baeck / Ann Marie Schumsky vs Peter Suttmeier / Gigi Badiola6-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 55 & Over Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GRA:Granby Guys & Gals:Suttmeier/Badiola0354983
2HTC:All Mixed Up:Schumsky/de Baeck03451292

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Donald Hoover
published
3.92
Debra Raviv
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Ann Marie Schumsky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Karen Piazza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Chris Drew
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Anthony Wion
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Cheryl Glasgow
published 4
3.35
Simon Ostrov
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
David Gordon
published 3.5
3.23
Frederic de Baeck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Monica Katzen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kristina Raymond
published
Lynn Siebert
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Donald Hoover
282W–125L career · no lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.98
4
Debra Raviv
76W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Ann Marie Schumsky
27W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Piazza
63W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Chris Drew
96W–64L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Anthony Wion
46W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Cheryl Glasgow
92W–94L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.57
Simon Ostrov
53W–67L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
David Gordon
2W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Frederic de Baeck
72W–107L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Monica Katzen
29W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Kristina Raymond
66W–61L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lynn Siebert
59W–37L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.