Teams

MC ORANGE

2024 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-18vs RHCC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesPerrin Kringel / Tracy Adreon vs Briana Jackson / Rebecca Strobel5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJanet Marks / Deborah Bautista vs Carrie Warren / Rachel Adams1-6, 5-7
2024-06-11vs HIW BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesTracy Adreon / Shari Pew vs Laura Billups / Sue Speyer2-6, 4-6
2024-06-04vs KC-RH BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesTracy Adreon / Perrin Kringel vs Kelly Fisher / Amy Shaw4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDeborah Bautista / Shari Pew vs Holly Sharpeta / Elizabeth Mathews6-1, 6-0
2024-05-28vs KC-RH REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTeri Harrington / Tracy Adreon vs Joelle Arne / Sara VanHook4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDeborah Bautista / Shari Pew vs Jami Jensen / Heidi Griffiths6-3, 6-2
2024-05-21vs LTC-D REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesTeri Harrington / Patricia Shaw vs April Kobayashi / Ginny Laadt2-6, 1-6
2024-05-14vs RHCC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesShari Pew / Deborah Bautista vs Rachel Adams / Briana Jackson6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2024-05-07vs HIW BLUELost 02
L#2 DoublesJanet Marks / Deborah Bautista vs Sue Speyer / Nora Alby4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTeri Harrington / Linda Wagner vs Amy Day / Nicole Reyes1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Deborah Bautista
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.22
Tracy Adreon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Janet Marks
published
2.88
Patricia Shaw
published
2.71
Teri Harrington
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Linda Wagner
published
Liz Magill
published
Perrin Kringel
published
Shari Pew
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Bautista + Shari Pew224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deborah Bautista
70W–34L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Tracy Adreon
34W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Janet Marks
12W–17L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Patricia Shaw
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Teri Harrington
22W–78L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Linda Wagner
9W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Liz Magill
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Perrin Kringel
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shari Pew
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.