Teams

SBrodsgaard

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.23 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-06vs RMatthewsLost 12
W#1 DoublesShayne Brodsgaard / Katie Percy vs Lindsay Strickland / Brittany Moye3-6, 3-0
L#2 DoublesDiane Adams / Jennifer Duerr vs Morgan Sheets / Julie Coyne3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Viele / Ginger Scanlon vs Janna Myers / Sarah Newton7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-09-29vs MBiringerWon 20
W#1 DoublesShayne Brodsgaard / Marilyn Slaymaker vs Laura Dennison / Celia Whited6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGinger Scanlon / Kathryn Kiel vs Mallory Biringer / Haley Davies7-5, 6-1
2022-09-22vs MHeathSplit 11
W#1 DoublesShayne Brodsgaard / Stacey Giglio vs Cara Kuremsky / Meagan Heath6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesGinger Scanlon / Marilyn Slaymaker vs Ashley Poston / Beth Rives0-6, 0-6
2022-09-15vs LVeit/BakerWon 21
W#1 DoublesShayne Brodsgaard / Ashley Walton vs Lee Veit / Meghan Paris2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGinger Scanlon / Katie Percy vs Alisa Smith / Amy Baker6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDiane Adams / Jennifer Duerr vs Caroline Wall / Gail Scoggin2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-09-08vs LElliottWon 21
W#1 DoublesShayne Brodsgaard / Emma Coblentz vs Sheffield Kropp / Anna Sagan6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStacey Giglio / Ginger Scanlon vs Lu Ann Little / Sarah Noah6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMarilyn Slaymaker / Diane Adams vs Jennifer Lawrence / Elizabeth Thompson5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-09-01vs DRusnakWon 30
W#1 DoublesShayne Brodsgaard / Kathryn Kiel vs Katherine Canavan / Jade Paunovich6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStacey Giglio / Ginger Scanlon vs Kelly Huffstetler / Natalie Norris6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmanda Viele / Katelyn Steadman vs Teri O'Neill / Rondi Furgason6-3, 7-5
2022-08-25vs KDay 5.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesShayne Brodsgaard / Ashley Walton vs Stephanie Ferrell / Margaret Ann Gonella6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGinger Scanlon / Stacey Giglio vs Kristin Esham / Emily Tripp4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-08-18vs RMatthewsLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathryn Kiel / Katelyn Steadman vs Rachel Matthews / Amanda Lindsay1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShayne Brodsgaard / Katie Percy vs Lindsay Strickland / Julia Kerr3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDiane Adams / Marilyn Slaymaker vs Emily Slater / Katherine Bratton3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Katie Percy
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.39
Kathryn Kiel
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.32
Emma Coblentz
published 3.5
3.31
Stacey Giglio
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Ashley Walton
published 3.5
3.14
Shayne Brodsgaard
usually #1 Doubles 81%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3
3.04
Marilyn Slaymaker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.81
Katelyn Steadman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Ginger Scanlon
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.69
Jennifer Duerr
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.49
Lauren Kilpatrick
published
2.46
Amanda Viele
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marilyn Slaymaker + Katie Percy341561% games+7.5% vs expected
Kathryn Kiel + Stacey Giglio6557% games+6.3% vs expected
Katie Percy + Kathryn Kiel3642% games−8.4% vs expected
Marilyn Slaymaker + Kathryn Kiel9267% gamesnot enough data
Marilyn Slaymaker + Shayne Brodsgaard6562% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Duerr + Katie Percy7264% gamesnot enough data
Marilyn Slaymaker + Stacey Giglio3648% gamesnot enough data
Katie Percy + Stacey Giglio7166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katie Percy
183W–74L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Kathryn Kiel
137W–120L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Emma Coblentz
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Stacey Giglio
143W–61L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Ashley Walton
18W–18L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3
Shayne Brodsgaard
130W–60L career · 16 lines in 2022
<1%15%85%
3.14
3
Marilyn Slaymaker
158W–104L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Katelyn Steadman
33W–27L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Ginger Scanlon
66W–52L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Jennifer Duerr
88W–59L career · 7 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Lauren Kilpatrick
15W–6L career · no lines in 2022
0%53%47%
2.49
3
Amanda Viele
6W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.