Teams

Team Abell

2023 Calvert Adult 18 & Over · Calvert Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-10vs Team Coker/WillhideLost 01
L#2 DoublesGiap Nguyen / Jonathan Ferrell vs Rik Sneeuwjagt / Angel Conty6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-05-27vs Team Coker/WillhideLost 01
L#2 DoublesThomas Swann / Jonathan Ferrell vs Rick Gladwell / Bruce Willhide2-6, 2-6
2023-05-20vs Team Coker/WillhideLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoseph Taylor / Jonathan Ferrell vs Campbell Hawkins / John Jiang4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-05-13vs Team Coker/WillhideWon 10
W#2 DoublesRichard Bishop / Jonathan Ferrell vs Clayton Coker / Todd Cervini7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2023-05-06Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJonathan Ferrell vs Tyler Dennis4-6, 1-6
2023-04-29vs Team Coker/WillhideWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephen Abell / Jonathan Ferrell vs Todd Cervini / Jason Wynn6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Calvert Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
3.67
Kevin Findley
published
3.66
Stephen Pereira
published
3.66
Andrew Hayes
published 4
3.63
Giap Nguyen
published 4
3.63
Richard Bishop
published
3.57
Joseph Taylor
published
3.54
3.51
Russell Carrington
published
3.50
Stephen Abell
published
3.43
Thomas Swann
published
3.40
Jonathan Ferrell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Russell Carrington + Richard Bishop044 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Taylor + Richard Bishop123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Guillermo Guerrero
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
Kevin Findley
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
Stephen Pereira
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Andrew Hayes
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Giap Nguyen
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
Richard Bishop
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.63
Joseph Taylor
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
Joanthan Fallowfield
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Russell Carrington
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
Stephen Abell
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
Thomas Swann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.43
4
Jonathan Ferrell
101W–197L career · 6 lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.