Teams

EAnderson-DFC

2025 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-06vs GDichter-CHTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesNick Buchler / Charles Wood vs Sudhanshu Handa / Zachary Osofsky0-6, 4-6
2025-04-15vs DHenley-HVCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesNick Buchler / James Fox vs Mark Anderson / John Burkert6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-08vs DBaddour-CHCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesNick Buchler / James Fox vs James Powell / Richard Woods7-6, 7-5
2025-04-01vs EShen-EPHWon 10
W#3 DoublesNick Buchler / Wilkins Aquino vs Sreejit Nair / Dan Dillon6-1, 6-0
2025-03-18vs RGoff-ENOSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEdward Anderson / Nick Buchler vs Aaron Kirschenfeld / Ivan Ross6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJeff Welty / Christopher Johnston vs Michael Young / Raj Butalia4-6, 6-7
2025-03-04vs SPerian-ENOLost 01
L#2 DoublesWilkins Aquino / Nick Buchler vs PRAVEEN ARUL / Praveen Krishnamurthy1-6, 4-6
2025-02-24vs JByrd-ENOLost 01
L#3 DoublesJeff Welty / Brandon Garrett vs Seth Layton / Bongsang Cho2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Jeffrey Clough
published
4.06
Edmund Malesky
published
3.94
Rod Snyder
published
3.78
Edward Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Nate Brown
published
3.65
Nick Buchler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Brandon Garrett
published 4
3.49
Jeff Welty
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Wilkins Aquino
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nick Buchler + Jeff Welty3448% gamesnot enough data
Christopher Johnston + Jeff Welty303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Clough
15W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
4.08
Edmund Malesky
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
4.06
Rod Snyder
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Edward Anderson
19W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Nate Brown
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Nick Buchler
31W–53L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Brandon Garrett
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Jeff Welty
20W–22L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Christopher Johnston
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Wilkins Aquino
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.