Teams

KY/LEX/Bishof

2022 USTA FALL LEAGUE 40 & Over · 4.0 WOMEN

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Hiroko Nakata
published 4
3.52
Karen Diggs
published
3.39
Kristen Tewell
published
3.39
Emily Diehl
published 3.5
3.33
Sarah Delahanty
published
3.26
Lynn Schlumpf
published
Emily Westerkamp
published 3.5
3.23
Lynn Littrell
published
3.21
Doris Senters
published 3.5
Karen Dangerfield
published
Laurie DeVore
published
Michelle Kline
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Tewell + Doris Senters7648% games+0.8% vs expected
Emily Diehl + Hiroko Nakata044 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Tewell + Sarah Delahanty213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hiroko Nakata
75W–50L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Karen Diggs
12W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.52
Kristen Tewell
32W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Emily Diehl
99W–69L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Sarah Delahanty
63W–35L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
Lynn Schlumpf
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Emily Westerkamp
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynn Littrell
17W–29L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Doris Senters
85W–66L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Karen Dangerfield
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laurie DeVore
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Kline
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.