Teams

STAP RED

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.58 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-25vs WP NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDan Rietema / Andres Seijas vs Chris Cramer / Sean OConnor6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEric Fonacier vs Brian Fitzgerrell6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMatthew Williams / Viktor Bojilov vs Matthew Shiveley / Charles Gabriel6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPeter Sarnataro / Kevin Ottomeyer vs Fred Stein / Mark Webster6-3, 6-4
2021-07-21vs CM BLACKLost 13
L#1 DoublesKevin Ottomeyer / Matthew Williams vs Michael Pardun / John Zuckert6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAndres Seijas vs Tim Fitz7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDavid Junta / Jason Hladik vs Paul Weissman / Mark Melberg7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDan Rietema / John McManemin vs Buck Flannigan / Brewster Boyd3-6, 3-6
2021-07-07vs EM BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesPeter Sarnataro / Andres Seijas vs John Esbenshade / Jon Becker6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesMichael Bismuth vs Thomas Toth6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDan Rietema / David Junta vs Adam Davy / Jason Krankota6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesViktor Bojilov / Kevin Ottomeyer vs John Winslow / Pat Sullivan3-6, 1-6
2021-06-30vs CP GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesAndres Seijas / David Junta vs Jay Toslosky / Eddie Sierra7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesEric Fonacier vs Jonny Caldwell6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Bismuth / Kevin Ottomeyer vs William Hissam / Myron Levey6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPeter Sarnataro / Viktor Bojilov vs Evan Dechtman / Brian Friel3-6, 5-7
2021-06-23vs CP REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesAndres Seijas / Dan Rietema vs Dennis Plant / Steve Gonzales6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesEric Fonacier vs Roland Eckenhausen6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMatthew Williams / Peter Sarnataro vs Gene Martinez / Michael Evans3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesViktor Bojilov / David Junta vs Fritz Gale / Greg Ernster7-5, 7-6
2021-06-21vs SKY GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesAndres Seijas / Jason Hladik vs Ross Goldstein / Robert Graham6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesEric Fonacier vs Joshua Solot6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMatthew Williams / Viktor Bojilov vs Brooks Pearson / Correy Jones6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPeter Sarnataro / David Junta vs Angus Campbell / Jeff Wright4-6, 4-6
2021-06-09vs DTC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMatthew Williams / Dan Rietema vs David Fawley / Paul Suter6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichael Bismuth vs Christopher Watts6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndres Seijas / John McManemin vs Craig Johnson / Frank Daidone6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJason Hladik / Eric Fonacier vs Howard Sankel / David Tighe6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Andres Seijas
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.75
Matthew Williams
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.66
Eric Fonacier
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.45
David Junta
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.40
John McManemin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Peter Sarnataro
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.98
Jason Hladik
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.95
Viktor Bojilov
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Dan Rietema
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Kevin Ottomeyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Michael Bismuth
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Rietema + David Junta6262% games+7.1% vs expected
Viktor Bojilov + Peter Sarnataro71049% games−1.7% vs expected
Peter Sarnataro + David Junta4253% games−2.2% vs expected
Matthew Williams + David Junta3351% games−3.0% vs expected
Jason Hladik + David Junta2745% games−8.9% vs expected
Peter Sarnataro + Jason Hladik61046% games−10.0% vs expected
Viktor Bojilov + Jason Hladik1631% games−15.8% vs expected
Viktor Bojilov + David Junta314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andres Seijas
99W–54L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.87
Matthew Williams
64W–35L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Eric Fonacier
49W–22L career · 5 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
David Junta
86W–48L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.45
John McManemin
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2021
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Peter Sarnataro
59W–47L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
3
Jason Hladik
21W–49L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
2.98
3.5
Viktor Bojilov
28W–42L career · 5 lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.95
Dan Rietema
13W–7L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kevin Ottomeyer
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Bismuth
13W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.