Teams

DTC GREEN

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.56 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-22vs EM BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesTed Marolt / Jeff Barton vs John Esbenshade / John Winslow4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesChristopher Watts vs Pat Sullivan6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesFrank Daidone / David Fawley vs Adam Davy / Derek Mullins6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDavid Tighe / Howard Sankel vs Jason Krankota / Jeffrey Munn6-3, 6-4
2021-07-21vs WP NAVYWon 31
L#1 DoublesTed Marolt / Jeff Barton vs Chris Cramer / Brian Fitzgerrell3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChristopher Watts vs Sean OConnor6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDavid Fawley / Frank Daidone vs Tony Gubenko / Brandon Stovall6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDon Reixach / David Tighe vs Zuben Bastani / Charles Gabriel6-3, 6-4
2021-07-07vs CP GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Fawley / Paul Suter vs Zeb Carabello / Jonny Caldwell6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCraig Johnson / Howard Sankel vs Evan Dechtman / Jeff Walters6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTed Marolt / Neil Nowak vs Myron Levey / Brian Friel6-0, 6-2
2021-06-30vs CP REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesChristopher Watts / Paul Suter vs Fritz Gale / Gene Martinez6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNeil Nowak vs Roland Eckenhausen6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTed Marolt / Frank Daidone vs Dennis Plant / Lou Gobis6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCraig Johnson / Howard Sankel vs Steve Gonzales / Greg Ernster6-0, 6-1
2021-06-23vs SKY GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDavid Fawley / Paul Suter vs Philip Briere / Ross Goldstein6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJeff Barton vs Brian Dwyer6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFrank Daidone / Craig Johnson vs Correy Jones / Brooks Pearson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Tighe / Howard Sankel vs Angus Campbell / Joshua Solot3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-06-16vs CM BLACKLost 13
L#1 DoublesDon Reixach / Ted Marolt vs Paul Weissman / Michael Pardun2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesChristopher Watts vs Tim Fitz1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCraig Johnson / Paul Suter vs Sidney Brock / Mark Melberg6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNeil Nowak / Jeff Barton vs Buck Flannigan / Brewster Boyd7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2021-06-09vs STAP REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDavid Fawley / Paul Suter vs Matthew Williams / Dan Rietema4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChristopher Watts vs Michael Bismuth6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCraig Johnson / Frank Daidone vs Andres Seijas / John McManemin3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesHoward Sankel / David Tighe vs Jason Hladik / Eric Fonacier4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
David Fawley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.62
Christopher Watts
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.58
Jeff Barton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.55
Paul Suter
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.49
Neil Nowak
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Howard Sankel
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Don Reixach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Ted Marolt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Frank Daidone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Craig Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.94
David Tighe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Barton + Neil Nowak5360% games+4.5% vs expected
David Fawley + Paul Suter8457% games+2.1% vs expected
Frank Daidone + Neil Nowak6749% games+1.2% vs expected
Craig Johnson + Frank Daidone3256% games+0.9% vs expected
Ted Marolt + Frank Daidone71148% games−6.4% vs expected
Craig Johnson + Howard Sankel4450% games−6.9% vs expected
Ted Marolt + Neil Nowak5167% gamesnot enough data
Howard Sankel + David Tighe224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Fawley
114W–63L career · 5 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Christopher Watts
32W–23L career · 5 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
Jeff Barton
38W–33L career · 4 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.58
Paul Suter
65W–70L career · 5 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Neil Nowak
64W–35L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Howard Sankel
28W–31L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Don Reixach
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Ted Marolt
67W–69L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Frank Daidone
58W–100L career · 5 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Craig Johnson
38W–48L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%56%44%
2.98
3.5
David Tighe
35W–51L career · 4 lines in 2021
68%32%<1%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.