Teams

OC T-Rex Swings - CMTC - Jessie- 9

OC Fall Team Singles · OC 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#2 SinglesRachel Om vs Ames Blas5-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMeng-Chieh Lee vs Megan Osborn7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2024-11-17vs OC CMTC - Tricia - Sun11Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRachel Om vs PATRICIA ARAKI2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2024-11-16vs OC CMTC - Tricia - Sun11Split 11
L#1 SinglesRisa Chung vs Athena Wong7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMina Whitlock vs Sabrina MacLachlan6-3, 6-3
2024-11-16vs OC CMTC - NishaWon 20
W#1 SinglesRachel Om vs Zheng Hua7-6, 3-2
W#3 SinglesMeng-Chieh Lee vs Gretchen Cuzick6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMina Whitlock vs Lana Dalley6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMeng-Chieh Lee vs Elizabeth Sanders6-2, 6-0
2024-10-20vs OC CMTC - NishaLost 12
L#1 SinglesQuynh Nghiem vs Sofia Ochoa0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesGia Bao Le vs Daniela Schardinger5-7, 2-6
W#3 SinglesBrittany Shieh vs Nisha Anish6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRachel Om vs Lori Mahoney Jones6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Meng-Chieh Lee
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
Brittany Shieh
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Mina Whitlock
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.98
Risa Chung
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.98
Rachel Om
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.62
Susie Kim
published
3.56
Gia Bao Le
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.29
Quynh Nghiem
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meng-Chieh Lee + Rachel Om5168% gamesnot enough data
Gia Bao Le + Rachel Om123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Meng-Chieh Lee
135W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Brittany Shieh
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Mina Whitlock
121W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
4
Risa Chung
157W–89L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Rachel Om
164W–64L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%56%43%
3.98
Susie Kim
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.62
Gia Bao Le
15W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.56
Quynh Nghiem
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.