Teams

Greenhill/Ericson-Chris W3.5S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-19vs The Nelson/Schmitz-Scott W3.5SWon 30
W#2 DoublesSummer Richbourg / Tricia Ericson vs Anne Givens / Bonnie Black6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKimberly Senior vs Shereen Yasin6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMargaret Cooley / Nikki Renwick vs Carolyn Strickfaden / Alexis Prochnow6-0, 6-1
2025-06-14vs Garland/Ritz W3.5SWon 21
L#1 DoublesKimberly Senior / Jill Chris vs Allison Carlson / Dawn Ritz1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSummer Richbourg / Tricia Ericson vs Ngoc Foster / Jessica Rice6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWendy Woodward / Margaret Cooley vs April Gorman / Jody Schueler7-5, 6-1
2025-06-07vs Gleneagles/Steyn-Cannon W3.5SWon 20
W#1 DoublesJill Chris / Kimberly Senior vs Jeni Garrett / Fay Moraif6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKelly Oujezdsky / Wendy Woodward vs Tracy LaRosiliere / Robin L Steyn6-0, 6-0
2025-05-17Won 20
W#1 DoublesKimberly Senior / Jill Chris vs Jana Ricker / Rhonda Price6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesWendy Woodward / Michelle Sepulveda vs Tara Hooper / Betty Preston6-3, 6-3
2025-05-10Split 11
W#2 DoublesJill Chris / Kimberly Senior vs Sarah Clayton / Marianne Hark6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesWendy Woodward / Brenda Reynolds vs Joanna Greenstone / Stephanie King2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-04-26Split 11
L#1 DoublesSummer Richbourg / Katherine Rader vs Lauren Oelke / Leslie Oelke3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMargaret Cooley / Kimberly Senior vs Dao Kelly / Fonn Lee6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Diamira Avila
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.51
Margaret Cooley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.43
Jill Chris
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Kimberly Senior
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.42
Summer Richbourg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Kelly Oujezdsky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Tricia Ericson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Katherine Rader
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Brenda Reynolds
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Nikki Renwick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Aundi Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Michelle Sepulveda
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Wendy Woodward
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ginger Kamm
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Cooley + Katherine Rader7163% games+3.8% vs expected
Jill Chris + Kimberly Senior11559% games−0.6% vs expected
Summer Richbourg + Katherine Rader4450% games−10.0% vs expected
Wendy Woodward + Kelly Oujezdsky5166% gamesnot enough data
Summer Richbourg + Wendy Woodward404 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Reynolds + Kelly Oujezdsky404 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Cooley + Jill Chris303 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Cooley + Wendy Woodward213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diamira Avila
35W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Margaret Cooley
41W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Jill Chris
25W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Kimberly Senior
17W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Summer Richbourg
57W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
3.42
Kelly Oujezdsky
20W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.39
Tricia Ericson
18W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Katherine Rader
21W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Brenda Reynolds
15W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Nikki Renwick
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Aundi Henderson
24W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Michelle Sepulveda
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Wendy Woodward
15W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Ginger Kamm
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.