Teams

Gleneagles/Steyn-Cannon W3.5S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

20 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-14Lost 02
L#2 DoublesSusan Forret / Gail Hasson vs Patti Kaiser / Betty Preston2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCaralyn Marketos vs Christina Norrie0-6, 4-6
2025-06-07vs Greenhill/Ericson-Chris W3.5SLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeni Garrett / Fay Moraif vs Jill Chris / Kimberly Senior1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Forret / Lisa Pieroni vs Aundi Henderson / Michelle Coates6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCaralyn Marketos vs Heather Williams5-7, 2-6
2025-05-17Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTina Hou / Fay Moraif vs Misty Carlyle / Cassedy Crawford1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobin L Steyn / Lisa Pieroni vs Kathie Norris / Tammie Bean1-6, 2-6
2025-04-26Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJeni Garrett / Tina Hou vs Chasti Gest / August Wood1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCaralyn Marketos vs Samantha Wicker2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anne Knepshield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Sally Bartlett
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.20
Lisa Pieroni
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Tina Hou
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Alexa Bridges
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Susan Forret
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Caralyn Marketos
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
LORI BOEDING
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Sara Dijak
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.04
LeAnn Priebe
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Robin L Steyn
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.94
Tracy LaRosiliere
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Gail Hasson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Becki Novak
published 3
2.65
Elsa Burg
published
2.65
Gail Hamilton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Susan Cannon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Fay Moraif
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jeni Garrett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Katie Murphree
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Bartlett + LeAnn Priebe1742% games−5.7% vs expected
Susan Forret + Tina Hou1436% gamesnot enough data
Susan Forret + Lisa Pieroni123 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Pieroni + LeAnn Priebe123 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Pieroni + Robin L Steyn033 matchesnot enough data
LeAnn Priebe + Caralyn Marketos033 matchesnot enough data
LORI BOEDING + Gail Hasson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anne Knepshield
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sally Bartlett
2W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Lisa Pieroni
2W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
Tina Hou
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Alexa Bridges
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Susan Forret
6W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.12
3.5
Caralyn Marketos
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
LORI BOEDING
20W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.07
Sara Dijak
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
LeAnn Priebe
7W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Robin L Steyn
1W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Tracy LaRosiliere
2W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
Gail Hasson
10W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Becki Novak
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Elsa Burg
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Gail Hamilton
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Susan Cannon
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
2.60
Fay Moraif
0W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeni Garrett
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Murphree
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.