Teams

MLF ORANGE

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs TAG GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesDonna Pham / Mary Beth Weir vs Lori Mooney-Malone / Amy Herold6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKelsey Mitchell vs Christy Mascarenas2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMagdalena Joyce / Tiffany Burns vs Thora Pabst / Beth Smits7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Pajak / Loretta Yabroff vs Carolyn Gattis / Stacie Emarine6-1, 6-0
2026-07-06vs LT BLACKLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Beth Weir / Donna Pham vs Tina Spicer / Shirley Moore3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristen Haberman vs Tiffany Croci6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaureen Maguire / Bernita Sterling vs Lee Anne Kempton / Susana Ortega3-6, 2-6
2026-06-29vs LT PURPLEWon 31
W#1 DoublesDonna Pham / Kelsey Mitchell vs Debbie Stechman / Bettina Cosima Larrarte6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristen Haberman vs Kristen Philbrook6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMagdalena Joyce / Tiffany Burns vs Julie Hostetter / Kalyn Wegher3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBernita Sterling / Maureen Maguire vs Sue Schneider / Ewa Pawlak6-3, 6-2
2026-06-22vs HMTC TEALLost 13
L#1 DoublesKathleen Vandenberg / Mary Beth Weir vs Jennifer Grim / Marcia Stauter4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristen Haberman vs Anne Spry4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMagdalena Joyce / Kelsey Mitchell vs Lori Masi / Crystal Stowe6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBernita Sterling / Loretta Yabroff vs Michelle Fang / Kelsi Wagner2-6, 1-6
2026-06-15vs FCCC BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesKristen Haberman / Kathleen Vandenberg vs Crystal Osthoff / Shanti Green1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesHelen Dunnington vs Nicole Holmes6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Beth Weir / Nancy Pajak vs Alison Morgan / Kathleen Tremblay6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKelsey Mitchell / Maureen Maguire vs Sherry McCoy / Ann Davidson7-6, 6-2
2026-06-08vs CSU GOLDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesHelen Dunnington / Kristen Haberman vs Lisa Martin / Jamie Heckman6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTiffany Burns vs Holly Rodriguez2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMagdalena Joyce / Kathleen Vandenberg vs Amy Dahlgren / Audrie Diel0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Pajak / Bernita Sterling vs Wendy Sprague / Diane Abshire6-2, 6-0
2026-06-01vs FCCC WHITELost 13
L#1 DoublesKathleen Vandenberg / Mary Beth Weir vs Deanna Verchick / Jessica Allman2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesHelen Dunnington vs Megan Kushner6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTiffany Burns / Kelsey Mitchell vs Rachel Yendra / Ashley McLaughlin1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Pajak / Maureen Maguire vs Molly Skold / Julie Chan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Helen Dunnington
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Mary Beth Weir
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.86
Nancy Pajak
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Kathleen Vandenberg
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Donna Pham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Kristen Haberman
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.65
Magdalena Joyce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Kelsey Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.56
Bernita Sterling
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.49
Loretta Yabroff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Tiffany Burns
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.47
Maureen Maguire
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Loretta Yabroff + Maureen Maguire4349% games+9.0% vs expected
Magdalena Joyce + Helen Dunnington8258% games+7.5% vs expected
Magdalena Joyce + Kristen Haberman3451% games+2.5% vs expected
Nancy Pajak + Mary Beth Weir3256% games+2.2% vs expected
Kathleen Vandenberg + Mary Beth Weir134 matchesnot enough data
Bernita Sterling + Maureen Maguire134 matchesnot enough data
Magdalena Joyce + Donna Pham224 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Pajak + Bernita Sterling213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Helen Dunnington
49W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Mary Beth Weir
29W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Nancy Pajak
56W–74L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Kathleen Vandenberg
14W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Donna Pham
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Kristen Haberman
20W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Magdalena Joyce
49W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
Kelsey Mitchell
7W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Bernita Sterling
71W–106L career · 4 lines in 2026
32%67%<1%
2.56
Loretta Yabroff
17W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
Tiffany Burns
14W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
Maureen Maguire
18W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.