Teams

LT BLACK

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs LT PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesTreasure McPherson / Tiffany Croci vs Kelley Knudson / Kristen Philbrook7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTina Spicer / Shirley Moore vs Kalyn Wegher / Sue Schneider6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSarah Kaplan / Janice Sale vs Ewa Pawlak / Leslie Taylor6-0, 6-1
2026-07-06vs MLF ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesTina Spicer / Shirley Moore vs Mary Beth Weir / Donna Pham6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTiffany Croci vs Kristen Haberman7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLee Anne Kempton / Susana Ortega vs Maureen Maguire / Bernita Sterling6-3, 6-2
2026-06-29vs HMTC TEALLost 13
L#1 DoublesTreasure McPherson / Shirley Moore vs Jennifer Grim / Marcia Stauter0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesPamela Massaro vs Kristin Daniels3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTina Spicer / Susana Ortega vs Kimberley Hattem / Susan Seiler7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJanet Krech / Sarah Kaplan vs Crystal Stowe / Kelsi Wagner6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-22vs CSU GOLDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesPamela Massaro / Lee Anne Kempton vs Lisa Martin / Holly Rodriguez7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTiffany Croci vs Audrie Diel0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusana Ortega / Tina Spicer vs Kathy Carlson / Amy Dahlgren6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJanet Krech / Janice Sale vs Diane Abshire / Jamie Heckman6-7, 1-6
2026-06-15vs TAG GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesTreasure McPherson / Tiffany Croci vs Beth Smits / Marcy Sanger7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSusana Ortega vs Christy Mascarenas6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTina Spicer / Janet Krech vs Sandy Chenore / Lori Mooney-Malone6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLee Anne Kempton / Angelika Bridgmon vs Stacie Emarine / Thora Pabst6-3, 6-1
2026-06-09vs FCCC WHITESplit 22
W#1 DoublesLee Anne Kempton / Treasure McPherson vs Tara Delaney / Rachel Yendra6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTiffany Croci vs Jessica Allman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusana Ortega / Sarah Kaplan vs Victoria Archer / Deanna Verchick4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShirley Moore / Janice Sale vs Jennifer Sbicca / Teresa Nugent6-3, 6-1
2026-06-01vs FCCC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesLee Anne Kempton / Treasure McPherson vs Kara Brown / Crystal Osthoff4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPamela Massaro vs Alison Morgan4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTina Spicer / Shirley Moore vs Shannon Holt / Nicole Holmes6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusana Ortega / Sarah Kaplan vs Sherry McCoy / Janice Brooks6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LT BLACK5219921208

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Kerry Sondgeroth
published
2.87
Tina Spicer
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.85
Susana Ortega
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.84
Janice Sale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Treasure McPherson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Shirley Moore
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.76
Janet Krech
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Lee Anne Kempton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.67
Tiffany Croci
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.64
Pamela Massaro
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.55
Angelika Bridgmon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Anne Kempton + Pamela Massaro6258% games+11.2% vs expected
Lee Anne Kempton + Treasure McPherson3453% games+9.0% vs expected
Janice Sale + Tina Spicer6258% games+2.9% vs expected
Treasure McPherson + Kerry Sondgeroth7850% games+1.2% vs expected
Shirley Moore + Pamela Massaro4445% games−2.2% vs expected
Janice Sale + Janet Krech91149% games−3.1% vs expected
Shirley Moore + Tina Spicer7354% games−4.2% vs expected
Shirley Moore + Susana Ortega134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kerry Sondgeroth
18W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Tina Spicer
31W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Susana Ortega
15W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Janice Sale
95W–103L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
Treasure McPherson
21W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
Shirley Moore
34W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Janet Krech
43W–51L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Lee Anne Kempton
57W–72L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
Tiffany Croci
23W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Pamela Massaro
31W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Angelika Bridgmon
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.