Teams

Brewer/Cleyman 4.0W 18s Thurs AM

2024 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 18 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-25vs Nundkumar/Kasik 4.0W 18s Thurs AMWon 10
W#2 DoublesTheresa Dockrill / Shawn McFarlin vs Leigh Abraham / Jenn Dean6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2024-04-11vs Strassell 4.0W 18s Thurs AMWon 10
W#3 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Lynn Guglielmo vs Linda Lowman / Courtney Penley6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Natalie Harris vs Andrea Sweat / Betsy Hooper6-1, 6-4
2024-03-21vs Nundkumar/Kasik 4.0W 18s Thurs AMWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynn Guglielmo / Shawn McFarlin vs Angela McGinn / Anna Lackey6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-07vs Strassell 4.0W 18s Thurs AMWon 10
W#3 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Beverly Tuttle vs Tracy Harlan / Sara Strassell4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Morgan Danford
published
3.93
Sarah Dunning
published
3.79
Shawn McFarlin
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.75
Dabney Porter
published 4
3.74
Kelly Gekas
published
3.70
Beverly Tuttle
published 4
3.70
Lynn Guglielmo
published
3.67
Heidi Wrisley
published 4
3.54
Natalie Harris
published
3.43
Carrie McElvogue
published 4
3.32
Rolinde Cleyman
published
Theresa Dockrill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Tuttle + Dabney Porter3741% games−5.1% vs expected
Shawn McFarlin + Lynn Guglielmo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Morgan Danford
35W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
4.36
Sarah Dunning
34W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.93
Shawn McFarlin
184W–155L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Dabney Porter
12W–26L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
Kelly Gekas
31W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Beverly Tuttle
15W–19L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Lynn Guglielmo
20W–13L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Heidi Wrisley
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
Natalie Harris
48W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.54
4
Carrie McElvogue
4W–23L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43
Rolinde Cleyman
5W–18L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
3.32
Theresa Dockrill
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.