Teams

Nundkumar/Kasik 4.0W 18s Thurs AM

2024 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 18 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-09vs Hilburn 4.0W 18s Thurs AMLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaggie Riley / Kara Jacobs vs Catherine Egerton / Beth Bell3-6, 4-6
2024-05-02vs Strassell 4.0W 18s Thurs AMWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Sexton / Maggie Riley vs Mary Beth Hartman / Jayne Johnston6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarla Barnwell / Maggie Riley vs April Moss / Lindsay Olin6-2, 6-2
2024-04-04vs Hilburn 4.0W 18s Thurs AMLost 01
L#1 DoublesSara Nundkumar / Maggie Riley vs Kelly Parr / Sue English1-6, 4-6
2024-03-28vs Strassell 4.0W 18s Thurs AMLost 01
L#1 DoublesDanielle Broadstreet / Maggie Riley vs Whitney Ellis / Felicia Price6-7, 4-6
2024-03-21vs Brewer/Cleyman 4.0W 18s Thurs AMLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaggie Riley / Danielle Broadstreet vs Morgan Danford / Theresa Dockrill4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Marla Barnwell
published
3.85
Leigh Abraham
published
3.79
Penny Trivette
published
3.78
Sara Nundkumar
published
Anna Lackey
published 4
3.64
3.64
Angela McGinn
published 4
3.60
Tammy Kasik
published
3.59
Maggie Riley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.50
Mary Sexton
published
3.49
Jenn Dean
published
3.32
Kara Jacobs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Broadstreet + Sara Nundkumar0535% gamesnot enough data
Marla Barnwell + Sara Nundkumar303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marla Barnwell
41W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.93
Leigh Abraham
29W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.85
Penny Trivette
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Sara Nundkumar
20W–19L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Anna Lackey
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Danielle Broadstreet
16W–17L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Angela McGinn
14W–16L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
Tammy Kasik
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
Maggie Riley
52W–49L career · 6 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Mary Sexton
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Jenn Dean
4W–14L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.49
Kara Jacobs
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.