Teams

Team 8 Aces & Eights

2022 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-27vs Team 11 Double the FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesErrin Matechak / Buu Nguyen vs Alan Ogilvie / Tracey White6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-03-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesNazo Burgy / Thomas Cyrnak vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-06vs Team 3 Can't Ace This.Won 20
W#1 DoublesJira Laprat / Thomas Cyrnak vs Sarah Saperstein / Joseph Awadalla6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErrin Matechak / Daniel Jones vs Kimberly Mielcarek / Roberto Ramos6-3, 5-6
2022-02-27vs Team 4 Wise Ace GOATsLost 01
L#2 DoublesErrin Matechak / Christian de Prins vs Elisabeth Wessels / Thoufiq Kaleemullah2-6, 3-6
2022-02-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesJira Laprat / Thomas Cyrnak vs Amanda Wenzel / Vinnie Khera2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-02-05vs Team 12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDoan Nguyen / Sunmin Kim vs Glen Medina / Alexandra Phillips2-6, 1-6
2022-01-29vs Team 2 SpoilersLost 02
L#1 DoublesNazo Burgy / Buu Nguyen vs Kelly Blackborow / Quentin Carter5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesErrin Matechak / Daniel Jones vs Candice Rininger / Mike Burgoyne2-6, 2-6
2022-01-22vs Team 5 Volley RanchersWon 10
W#2 DoublesNazo Burgy / Christian de Prins vs Jang Han / Andrew Wanamaker6-3, 6-1
2022-01-05vs Team 7 MidCourt CrisisLost 01
L#3 DoublesAaron Ohmer / Sunmin Kim vs Jose Miguel Sacin / Malini Sekhar2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Thomas Cyrnak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Nazo Burgy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Thuan Lai
published
3.80
Errin Matechak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Sunmin Kim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Daniel Jones
published 4
3.68
Aaron Ohmer
published 4
3.60
Meg Kelly
published
3.58
3.20
Doan Nguyen
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Thomas Cyrnak
311W–89L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
4.54
4
Nazo Burgy
116W–68L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.89
Thuan Lai
15W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Errin Matechak
176W–161L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Sunmin Kim
79W–66L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Daniel Jones
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Aaron Ohmer
21W–19L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Meg Kelly
25W–12L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Melissa Swearingen
69W–68L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Doan Nguyen
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.