Teams

Thiels/18/3.5/MXD/BTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Mixed 18 & Over · 3.5 Shrev

15 players · average NTRP 3.21 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-09vs Stuart/18/3.5/MXD/POTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Wilkes / Rhonda Rubben vs Jason Rogers / Stephanie Knox3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChad Santos / Allison Santos vs Chad Souter / Victoria Strealy2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCorey Pepper / Mary Ward vs Chris Singletary / Laura Singletary3-6, 1-6
2026-06-02vs Roberts/18/3.5/MXD/BTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDaniel Brignac / Mary Ward vs Katherine Roberts / Austin Hedges6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAllison Santos / Chad Santos vs Chris Tilley / Brooke Romero2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-12vs Burchett-Wang/18/3.5/MXD/BTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Wilkes / Kristen Doyal vs Rachael Deere / Caleb Kwok6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLora Slack / Daniel Brignac vs Trish White / Robert Kyle2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesValarie Thiels / Chris Thiels vs Ene Wang / Steven Anderson3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-05-05vs Gifford-Hatfield/18/3.5/MXD/STCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAllison Santos / Daniel Brignac vs Margaret Gifford / Jon Bryn6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLane McKenzie / Madeline Slack vs Corey Oliphint / Catherine Simonton6-4, 6-4
2026-04-28vs Walsh-Rivers/18/3.5/MXD/CTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Wilkes / Gina Robinson vs Anthony Jeter / Tanji Lyrse7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJamie Pipes / Kaitlyn Pipes vs Matthew Walsh / Shannon Miles6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesValarie Thiels / Chris Thiels vs Albert Hardison / Jacqueline Hardison7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-04-21vs McCoy/18/3.5/MXD/POTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesRhonda Rubben / David Wilkes vs Kimberly Arizmendi / Matthew Little6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesValarie Thiels / Chris Thiels vs Paul Cavell / Amy Stafford6-3, 6-2
2026-04-18vs Gifford-Hatfield/18/3.5/MXD/STCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Wilkes / Kristen Doyal vs James Hatfield / Margaret Gifford6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Ward / Corey Pepper vs Laura Gooszen / Sean Deere6-3, 6-4
2026-04-14vs Roberts/18/3.5/MXD/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJamie Pipes / Rhonda Rubben vs Holly Hightower / Isaac Thomas4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Doyal / Lane McKenzie vs Krysta Cyr / Brannigan Bissell4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChris Thiels / Kaitlyn Pipes vs Logan McConathy / Lindsay Dean6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Stuart/18/3.5/MXD/POTC6219511145
2Burchett-Wang/18/3.5/MXD/BTC6216817149
3Thiels/18/3.5/MXD/BTC53141026222
4Roberts/18/3.5/MXD/BTC53141027233
5Gifford-Hatfield/18/3.5/MXD/STCC35101435245
6Walsh-Rivers/18/3.5/MXD/CTC2671738248
7McCoy/18/3.5/MXD/POTC1742043273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Daniel Brignac
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Jamie Pipes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Mary Ward
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Rhonda Rubben
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Gina Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Chris Thiels
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
3.21
Lora Slack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Kristen Doyal
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Lane McKenzie
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Madeline Slack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Emily Ward
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Corey Pepper
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.00
Valarie Thiels
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
2.69
Kaitlyn Pipes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.47
Chad Santos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valarie Thiels + Chris Thiels12562% games+7.2% vs expected
Madeline Slack + Lane McKenzie7064% games+0.8% vs expected
Mary Ward + Corey Pepper314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniel Brignac
35W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Jamie Pipes
61W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
Mary Ward
39W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
Rhonda Rubben
57W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Gina Robinson
33W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3
Chris Thiels
55W–19L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.23
Lora Slack
51W–51L career · 1 line in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
Kristen Doyal
12W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
Lane McKenzie
18W–4L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.03
Madeline Slack
46W–32L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Emily Ward
15W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Corey Pepper
36W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Valarie Thiels
87W–46L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
Kaitlyn Pipes
29W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Chad Santos
1W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.