Teams

Sanford - Forest Lakes

2025 Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-23vs BHSC- JohnsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelly Guyton / Shauna Hogg vs Lauren Dunn / Jessicah Collins6-0, 6-4
2025-07-22vs BHSC - Racket Science-JordanLost 01
L#2 DoublesLynette Sanford / Judy Roy vs Carleen Kupcis / Silvia Blemker4-6, 4-6
2025-07-21vs Glenmore- EgidiWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Manley / Shauna Hogg vs Tamara Freeman / Debbie Lonnquest6-3, 6-0
2025-07-07vs ACAC Terminetters-MeyerWon 10
W#2 DoublesLynette Sanford / Judy Roy vs Samantha Bates / Courtney Wenleder3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Manley / Lynette Sanford vs Catherine Brown / Gina Hogue6-0, 6-1
2025-06-29vs Merrick - KeswickSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLynette Sanford / Kelly Guyton vs Jessica Johnson / Janet Silvester4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShauna Hogg / Terry Roberts vs Cailin Collier / Anais Gupton1-6, 0-6
2025-06-18vs BHSC - Racket Science-JordanLost 01
L#3 DoublesLynette Sanford / Shauna Hogg vs Jill Lerner / Brandy Bridges4-6, 4-6
2025-06-16vs Glenmore- EgidiWon 10
W#2 DoublesTerry Roberts / Lynette Sanford vs Brooke Vergales / Pam Socolow6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Mary Manley
published
2.80
Kelly Guyton
published
2.72
Lynette Sanford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.62
Judy Roy
published
2.58
Terry Roberts
published
2.54
Michelle Katstra
published
2.54
2.28
Shauna Hogg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.07
Beth Kohler
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynette Sanford + Shauna Hogg151054% games+2.7% vs expected
Mary Manley + Kelly Guyton3251% games−1.4% vs expected
Lynette Sanford + Mary Manley224 matchesnot enough data
Christine Eagleson + Judy Roy033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Manley
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Kelly Guyton
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Lynette Sanford
93W–90L career · 10 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Judy Roy
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.62
Terry Roberts
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Michelle Katstra
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Christine Eagleson
0W–11L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
2.5
Shauna Hogg
40W–97L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Beth Kohler
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.