Teams

Sassy Strings

2022 NOVA Singles Fall Women · NOVA Singles 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-10-22vs RJ Net AssetsLost 01
L#1 SinglesElisa Wolf vs Anna Monaghan3-6, 1-5
2022-10-15Lost 01
L#1 SinglesSarah Icore vs Jacqueline Corcoran2-6, 0-6
2022-10-09vs Nice AcesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSarah Icore vs April Rabayda6-7, 1-2
W#3 SinglesElisa Wolf vs Haida McGovern4-6, 5-0
2022-10-08vs Sassy SmashersLost 02
L#1 SinglesRosy Mcgillan vs Dawn Regan1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesElisa Wolf vs Brandy Johns4-6, 1-6
2022-09-24vs SpinderellasLost 01
L#2 SinglesSarah Icore vs Mary Tisch3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-17vs RJ Net AssetsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSarah Icore vs Marcela Vavrova0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJoi Ruther vs Lynnita Montague-Daddio7-6, 2-0
2022-09-10vs Slice GirlsWon 20
W#1 SinglesSarah Icore vs Ayako Doi6-7, 5-3
W#3 SinglesElisa Wolf vs Katherine Virkstis7-5, 3-2
2022-09-03vs Sassy SmashersLost 02
L#1 SinglesRosy Mcgillan vs Brandy Johns1-6, 3-4
L#2 SinglesJoi Ruther vs Dawn Regan2-6, 4-5
2022-08-27vs Nice AcesLost 01
L#2 SinglesSarah Icore vs April Rabayda2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-08-20Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRosy Mcgillan vs Ashley Vroman-Lee0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Josephine Cooper
published
3.33
Elisa Wolf
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Monica Popp
published 3.5
2.48
Rosy Mcgillan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.44
Amy Heuer
published 2.5
2.28
Sarah Icore
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.25
Joi Ruther
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rosy Mcgillan + Sarah Icore2644% gamesnot enough data
Monica Popp + Elisa Wolf6165% gamesnot enough data
Rosy Mcgillan + Joi Ruther3261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Josephine Cooper
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Elisa Wolf
177W–86L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Monica Popp
75W–47L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
2.5
Rosy Mcgillan
40W–68L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%57%43%
2.48
2.5
Amy Heuer
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
0%67%33%
2.44
2.5
Sarah Icore
46W–59L career · 6 lines in 2022
0%95%5%
2.28
2.5
Joi Ruther
94W–122L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%97%3%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.