Teams

Nice Aces

2022 NOVA Singles Fall Women · NOVA Singles 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.19 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-22vs Sassy SmashersLost 01
L#1 SinglesEleanor McManus vs Indre Conners0-6, 2-5
2022-10-08vs SpinderellasWon 10
W#3 SinglesEleanor McManus vs Magdalena Lewandowski6-0, 6-0
2022-09-24Lost 01
L#3 SinglesJennifer Annessa vs Jacqueline Corcoran7-5, 1-5
2022-09-17vs Sassy SmashersWon 20
W#2 SinglesEleanor McManus vs Yulan Jin6-0, 5-3
W#3 SinglesTricia Hodnett vs Laura Jairam6-3, 4-5
2022-09-03vs SpinderellasLost 01
L#1 SinglesTricia Hodnett vs Lorena Alfaro6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-08-27vs Sassy StringsWon 10
W#1 SinglesEleanor McManus vs Amy Heuer6-0, 6-0
2022-08-20Won 10
W#1 SinglesEleanor McManus vs Jacqueline Corcoran6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Elizabeth Young
published 3.5
3.27
Eleanor McManus
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Jennifer Annessa
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Tricia Hodnett
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
3.03
Ingabritt Dorame
published 3
2.84
Alison Lopez
published 3
2.71
April Rabayda
published 3
2.67
2.55
Kathleen Barnett
published
Nanke Vico
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eleanor McManus + Jennifer Annessa4167% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Young
36W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Eleanor McManus
187W–113L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Jennifer Annessa
71W–49L career · 1 line in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3
Tricia Hodnett
99W–109L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Ingabritt Dorame
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Alison Lopez
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
April Rabayda
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Elizabeth Messner
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.67
Kathleen Barnett
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
2.55
Nanke Vico
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.